Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'cache': 0.07; 'suppose': 0.07; 'parameter': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'seemed': 0.09; '4gb': 0.16; 'appreciated!': 0.16; 'caching': 0.16; 'flags,': 0.16; 'message- id:@post.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:mediaways.net': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:pool.mediaways.net': 0.16; 'subject:usage': 0.16; 'all,': 0.19; 'trying': 0.19; 'memory': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'question': 0.24; 'this:': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'tried': 0.27; "i'm": 0.30; 'once,': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'ubuntu': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'wrong': 0.37; 'skip:o 20': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'new': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'dear': 0.65; 'subjectcharset:utf-8': 0.72; 'lack': 0.78; '(still': 0.84; 'subject:skip:o 10': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Wolfgang Maier Subject: usage of =?utf-8?b?b3MucG9zaXhfZmFkdmlzZQ==?= Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 17:27:04 +0000 (UTC) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 95.115.1.121 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:21.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/21.0) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 26 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1369762047 news.xs4all.nl 15970 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:35348 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:46314 Dear all, I was just experimenting for the first time with os.posix_fadvise(), which is new in Python3.3 . I'm reading from a really huge file (several GB) and I want to use the data only once, so I don't want OS-level page caching. I tried os.posix_fadvise with the os.POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE and with the os.POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED flags, but neither seemed to have any effect on the caching behaviour of Ubuntu (still uses all available memory to page cache my I/O). Specifically, I was trying this: import os fd = os.open('myfile', os.O_RDONLY) # wasn't sure about the len parameter in fadvise, # so thought I just use it on the first 4GB os.posix_fadvise(fd, 0, 4000000000, os.POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE) # or DONTNEED then reading from the file with os.read() . By its very nature, I suppose posix_fadvise's effects will be OS-dependent, so my question is whether the lack of effect I'm observing is something Ubuntu-specific, or if I'm just using it in a wrong way. Any help is greatly appreciated! Best, Wolfgang