Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.02; 'value,': 0.04; 'explicitly': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'float': 0.07; 'odd': 0.07; 'skip:` 10': 0.07; 'variables': 0.07; 'default.': 0.09; 'function,': 0.09; 'implements': 0.09; 'to)': 0.09; 'trailing': 0.09; 'truncated': 0.09; 'variant': 0.09; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'brackets.': 0.16; 'comma': 0.16; 'dictionaries': 0.16; 'division.': 0.16; 'evaluating': 0.16; 'higher-level': 0.16; 'magic': 0.16; 'optimised': 0.16; 'readable': 0.16; 'sane': 0.16; 'subject:user': 0.16; 'toolbox': 0.16; 'tutorials.': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'sender:addr:gmail.com': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'obviously': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; 'thoughts': 0.19; 'select': 0.22; 'programming': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'error': 0.23; 'integer': 0.24; 'new,': 0.24; 'simpler': 0.24; 'skip:` 20': 0.24; '(or': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; 'point': 0.28; 'statement': 0.30; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'along': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'gives': 0.31; '(unless': 0.31; 'bad.': 0.31; 'cgi': 0.31; 'division': 0.31; 'perl': 0.31; 'though.': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'probably': 0.32; 'languages': 0.32; 'another': 0.32; 'quite': 0.32; 'open': 0.33; 'everyone': 0.33; 'bugs': 0.33; 'cases': 0.33; 'level.': 0.33; "i'd": 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'tool': 0.35; 'convert': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; "he's": 0.36; 'largely': 0.36; 'done': 0.36; 'useful': 0.36; 'subject:New': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'list': 0.37; 'level': 0.37; 'work?': 0.38; 'von': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'little': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'flow': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'subject: / ': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; 'mentioned': 0.61; 'john': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'advanced': 0.63; 'high': 0.63; 'myself': 0.63; 'him,': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; 'youtube': 0.65; 'past.': 0.68; 'statement,': 0.68; 'grow': 0.77; 'avoids': 0.84; 'fortunately,': 0.84; 'level"': 0.84; 'message)': 0.84; 'weaker': 0.84; 'good,': 0.91; 'imagine': 0.93; '2013': 0.98; 'mr.': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=dnhzgVIP6JX90q/83GvkaeNk4xtDESk9pzQCUwCaCds=; b=ipZ2H5IE8uOtVqogTqlj1XOkTsy8WnAtzU1otdFf1Ka6UTwNAKGcwYOQ+aQLkk8tuM /+os4eX5kRHlEdej11BLKY42uxMkuvAnJCoWgfI3gc1/Bhswhjc2Qpqr2OL+QSjmD7Ks BSucNcrFUJRuRwegmNYH6d6cGCEcV70PKhiJPQCCd4AadIV/hqsHKVsbOV5JKxT4uTXm buAyAN6GmHh5YzxU6mC+2FZy4PAkiQ6ct3VUmpmDEJNsA9NvodjYo6dA3m0LA2KWlkV7 2dGCCUjIOJJIQ5QOtllJ/oeLNePxEelo74tt1VRe0y6HVFma1gKojtZ1jwVU+e/wINJr QdVQ== X-Received: by 10.152.216.167 with SMTP id or7mr14743763lac.10.1384003662118; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 05:27:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <-JadnUirYuhUruPPnZ2dnUVZ8rSdnZ2d@bt.com> References: <-JadnUirYuhUruPPnZ2dnUVZ8rSdnZ2d@bt.com> From: Joshua Landau Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 13:27:02 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: HSEVDghiPxm4mfX58H87fn6MC_o Subject: Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python To: John von Horn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: python-list X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 67 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1384004023 news.xs4all.nl 15940 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53386 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:58936 On 9 November 2013 13:08, John von Horn wrote: > I'm Mr. Noobie here, I've just started easing into Python (2.7.4) and am > enjoying working along to some youtube tutorials. I've done a little > programming in the past. > > I've just got a few thoughts I'd like to share and ask about: > > * Why not allow floater=float(int1/int2) - rather than floater=float > (int1)/float(int2)? > > Give me a float (or an error message) from evaluating everything in the > brackets. Don't make me explicitly convert everything myself (unless I > want to) In Python 2, `int1/int2` does integer division. So `float(that_result)` gives a truncated float. `int1/float(int2)` obviously avoids this by dividing by a float. If `float(int1/int2)` were to return the same value, `float` could not be a normal function, and would have to be magic. Magic is bad. Fortunately, Python 3 does the sane thing and just does floating-point division by default. Great, eh? > * No sign of a select .. case statement > > Another useful tool in the programmer's toolbox > > Select DayofWeek > > case "mon" > > ... > > end select `select` is quite an odd statement, in that in most cases it's just a weaker variant of `if`. By the time you're at the point where a `select` is actually more readable you're also at the point where a different control flow is probably a better idea. Things like dictionaries or a variables pointing to functions are really useful and can be encapsulated in a class quite well. This is a bit more advanced but largely more rigorous. But most of the time the idea is just that an `if` is more explicit, and it's not like a `case` statement can be optimised as it can in lower-level languages with simpler datatypes. > * Call me pedantic by why do we need a trailing comma for a list of one > item? Keep it intuitive and allow lstShopping=[] or ["Bread"] or > ["Bread", "Milk","Hot Chocolate"] I don't like ["Bread",]. It bugs me. You don't. You might be confused because you need to write `("hello",)`, but that's because the *comma* makes a *tuple*, not the brackets. Imagine if `2 * (1/2)` gave you `(0.5, 0.5)`! > Is everyone happy with the way things are? Could anyone recommend a good, > high level language for CGI work? Not sure if I'm going to be happy with > Perl (ahhh, get him, he's mentioned Perl and is a heretic!) or Python. I > would very much value any constructive criticism or insights. I don't know squat about CGI, but I think Python can grow on anyone open to the idea of programming at a high level. Not "high level" as in "expert" but as in "using higher-level constructs", if you get the meaning. Python implements these quite well. Your first two complaints are not new, though.