Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.015 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'yet.': 0.04; 'matches': 0.07; 'indication': 0.09; 'okay': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'chained': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'tuple': 0.16; 'tuples,': 0.16; ':-)': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; "python's": 0.19; 'programming': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'error': 0.23; "haven't": 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'suggested': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'raise': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'that.': 0.31; 'another': 0.32; 'could': 0.34; 'subject:with': 0.35; 'agree': 0.35; 'point.': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'consistent': 0.36; 'effort': 0.37; '12,': 0.39; 'catch': 0.60; 'ian': 0.60; 'simply': 0.61; 'here': 0.66; '2015': 0.84; 'alternative.': 0.84; 'subject:..': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=iFS27yHsswGXtD8JesPeofosR201WYNXDJzsTn3B6ik=; b=bZi32CeSqlPrhEW25cBNTiTiuTrdUPQ/HIGotR5Fyw9f+aS9c/o48Z0fL9PT8Kjs1r fYK5575M2DfJuv+IweRpIY09CJn9nlwof6tUvPNu0pyGJS8iJw71sfoTMG1M0mVT2RNk tQm5A2Zuz49BCmuNxFJvlia+DlL4WfUHBn6nmzIYgKFil57JZoVmm5SqfH1G53h1XqUJ Q6lblTTCBKqQB6CHVbmPhmVM6V/5m4MXgr81sx1L+K2a7c77ZUDP5aHMch9uSNkeUUp8 XkYwvAI5oU/seoWSwuHGlBUfM29+KNn+E+nT8vGN+0T12P2P+CHno4JrVo+LXE6U//Xx +3AQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.61.175 with SMTP id q15mr6647083igr.34.1428782693472; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 13:04:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5528feec$0$13002$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 06:04:53 +1000 Subject: Re: try..except with empty exceptions From: Chris Angelico Cc: Python Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1428782701 news.xs4all.nl 2900 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:34545 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:88839 On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 4:49 AM, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Apr 11, 2015 5:06 AM, "Steven D'Aprano" > wrote: >> >> Yes, I agree that Python's behaviour here is better than the alternative. >> Having "except ()" catch nothing is consistent with the behaviour with >> other tuples, so I'm okay with that. But it still surprised me :-) > > There's another alternative that I haven't seen suggested yet. An empty > tuple could be considered an indication of a programming error and raise a > chained ValueError. Not really a lot of point. Just as with isinstance, an empty tuple simply matches nothing. Why go to the effort of rejecting it? ChrisA