Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.004 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'interpreter': 0.07; 'tab': 0.07; 'bash': 0.09; 'command.': 0.09; 'interpreter,': 0.09; 'bash,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'interface': 0.23; 'referring': 0.23; 'pm,': 0.24; 'command': 0.24; 'aug': 0.24; 'windows': 0.26; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.29; 'btw,': 0.30; 'closer': 0.30; 'sun,': 0.30; "isn't": 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'nobody': 0.34; 'uses': 0.35; 'unless': 0.36; 'using': 0.37; '(not': 0.38; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; "it's": 0.40 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eW2iCiuIaMlKAOtXPqanLaAQqSip3ZSD9gaIG0CBKgA=; b=ZZmTevEp7CyIPQs28xOdJ9fhvLCp0iQbe/yw7opW3VyOT3oEAqhJdA1SkmgSYvf8cJ kyo/8J60a4F2YkSNo2b2HWaFiASVZhIT6JKFG6cv6XVrN+mz2f8nQGn9aWn54g9UMwAu ET5RfEqGaiPD6Dy5iYQlr5KXAt34/4Vg84uCs= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 16:52:05 +0100 Subject: Re: pythonw.exe From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 15 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1313337128 news.xs4all.nl 23870 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37389 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:11399 On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Nobody wrote: > BTW, unless you're using Windows 95/98/ME, you don't have a > "DOS Prompt". The command prompt in Windows NT/2000/XP/Vista/7 isn't DOS. > I don't see this as any sloppier than referring to "opening a prompt" when you mean "opening up a windowed command interpreter". The command interpreter in NT+ uses an interface that derives from the original DOS command interpreter, and a lot of people consider it to be as primitive (not realising that it has a lot of features, eg tab completion, that are WAY better even than command+doskey); it's a lot closer to Unix's bash than to MS-DOS's command. (I do prefer bash, though.) ChrisA