Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.088 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.82; '*S*': 0.00; 'charset:iso-8859-7': 0.04; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'oh,': 0.09; "(it's": 0.16; 'chrome,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'send,': 0.16; 'subject:issue': 0.16; 'typos': 0.16; 'utterly': 0.16; 'hire': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'typing': 0.19; 'work,': 0.20; 'either.': 0.24; 'errors.': 0.24; 'mind.': 0.24; 'tend': 0.24; 'fine': 0.24; 'posts': 0.26; 'post': 0.26; 'asking': 0.27; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'appear': 0.29; 'correct': 0.29; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'words': 0.29; 'have,': 0.30; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'lines': 0.31; 'too.': 0.31; 'catching': 0.31; 'fast.': 0.31; 'quite': 0.32; 'subject: (': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'google': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'impression': 0.36; 'minutes,': 0.36; 'real-time': 0.36; 'seconds': 0.37; 'too': 0.37; 'sometimes': 0.38; 'window': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'even': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'easy': 0.60; 'catch': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; 'hope': 0.61; 'browser': 0.61; 'effective': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'you.': 0.62; 'back': 0.62; "you'll": 0.62; 'skip:n 10': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'effectively': 0.66; 'broadcast': 0.68; 'email,': 0.69; 'coffee': 0.84; 'crew': 0.84; 'flies': 0.84; 'mistakenly': 0.91; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gfzTJs63ehQ6GkYxvhtlpE8CCfPs8Br4Qn34uWDByKM=; b=n584w26b2e6SQi/354lfW2vTQ1p94dj3ehhsGiEurMicHepMC6Ttfqg6gHKjE6MYN3 fyQUF46rNKyV4/L5yuyRO8krAYf4vKylp6eSDYS30mw6z6vVEfN9o5BKMNl1DqXGWTCz dT2uSH2Y+2GSVRxRP/PJzSoXBm5qVabdeDWeEvA7LpvU0KuNcrFmdMPvL5lUYKfaq5QY aeFlerGndge8mQkvr+kc/YczXU1W0/TUMEKi0UBAl7jMt4hZtGArl7Nguhdj59CTTMUe 9h408V50wS26B1WxyoOZvR6I6wpYbBbND0s84EUtHK7qWjAbKP70YhYg554BO1CQ1/oe 47Ww== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.121.99 with SMTP id lj3mr4779094vdb.52.1369693086885; Mon, 27 May 2013 15:18:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9d0cfcdd-0644-4d15-8165-5452c19e57a3@googlegroups.com> References: <7823093c-2c07-4fa0-ae97-960c62f8ff9d@googlegroups.com> <69f5q8hkra42rvpfmbng4f0airgikqf5js@4ax.com> <9560d43f-8100-4914-9a71-c30ab479ec35@googlegroups.com> <529f6d18-65a3-437a-944c-890bbacd9212@googlegroups.com> <9d0cfcdd-0644-4d15-8165-5452c19e57a3@googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 08:18:06 +1000 Subject: Re: Encodign issue in Python 3.3.1 (once again) From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 34 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1369693095 news.xs4all.nl 15955 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:58638 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:46228 On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 2:56 AM, =CD=DF=EA=EF=F2 =C3=EA=F133=EA wrote: > =D4=E7 =C4=E5=F5=F4=DD=F1=E1, 27 =CC=E1=C0=EF=F5 2013 6:52:32 =EC.=EC. UT= C+3, =EF =F7=F1=DE=F3=F4=E7=F2 Chris Angelico =DD=E3=F1=E1=F8=E5: > >> Oh, and you may want to hire a typist, too. At the moment, your posts >> make you appear not to care about the job. > > I always make typos when iam typing fast. Yes, but then you don't go back and correct them before hitting Send, which is what makes you appear to care very little. Typos in real-time chat are understandable (though even on MUDs, most people tend to broadcast less typos than your posts have, because even there there's time to edit before hitting Enter), but with email, it's very easy to spend 60 seconds glancing over your post before you send it. You're using gmail, so chances are all you need to do is use a web browser with a spellchecker and you'll catch all of the typos; I use Google Chrome, and it has the now-prevalent red squiggly lines under all suspected errors. (It's not perfect, of course; quite a few correctly-spelled words are mistakenly flagged. But it's still pretty effective at catching typos.) You're effectively asking people to put in a few minutes' work, sometimes quite a few minutes, to help you. Is it too much to hope that you'll spend one more minute on your posts? This is something that's utterly trivial, yet a window to your mind. It's like boarding an airliner and finding coffee stains on the flip-down trays - the plane flies just fine with those stains, yet the impression they give is that the crew don't care about engine maintenance either. ChrisA