Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.081 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.84; '*S*': 0.01; 'received:134': 0.05; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'subject:into': 0.09; 'nevertheless': 0.16; 'said.': 0.16; 'ignore': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'tables': 0.26; 'defined': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'database,': 0.30; 'relational': 0.31; 'subject:Database': 0.31; 'table,': 0.31; 'implemented': 0.33; 'but': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'sometimes': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'read': 0.60; 'effectively': 0.66; '8bit%:100': 0.72; 'carefully': 0.74; 'pardon': 0.84; 'relation.': 0.84; 'relations.': 0.84 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqEEAFLsfFKGuA9G/2dsb2JhbABahwa5JoJ5gUODGQEBBSMPAT8GEQkCGAICBRYLAgIJAwIBAgFFEwgCh32ORZteiTWJFIEpjkUWglWBRQOYD4Ypi2KDJw Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:53:44 +0100 From: Antoon Pardon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: To whoever hacked into my Database References: <527a5f79$1@news.synserver.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1383918825 news.xs4all.nl 15963 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42008 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:58790 Op 08-11-13 14:31, Mark Lawrence schreef: > On 08/11/2013 10:05, Νίκος Αλεξόπουλος wrote: >> >> I never ignore advices. >> I read all answers as carefully as i can. >> But nevertheless sometimes i feel things should have been better >> implemented using my way. > > The only relational database that has no relationships as effectively > there's only one table, despite what Denis McMahon (amongst others?) has > said. I thought that in a relational database, the tables were the relations. So a database with one table, defined one relation. -- Antoon Pardon