Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.146.MISMATCH!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <przemolicc@poczta.fm>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: UNSURE 0.302
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.44; '*S*': 0.05; 'rows': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'assume': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; '+0100,': 0.23; 'indexing': 0.23; 'pm,': 0.24; 'aug': 0.24; 'thu,': 0.28; 'strings.': 0.30; 'chris': 0.32; 'list': 0.32; 'sort': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.34; 'subject: ?': 0.34; 'hold': 0.35; 'run': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'data': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'from:no real name:2**0': 0.63; 'charset:iso-8859-2': 0.66; '11,': 0.68; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.71; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.71; 'received:pl': 0.84; 'telefon': 0.84; '10000': 0.91; 'url:pl': 0.93
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:50:29 +0200
From: przemolicc@poczta.fm
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: String concatenation - which is the fastest way ?
References: <20110810111754.GD5045@host.pgf.com.pl> <CAPTjJmrF0GcVs0onfoCHAbMe38b5iLXgFX1R7G_RXcKxjPH5wQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110810133146.GE5045@host.pgf.com.pl> <j1ub3q$65c$1@dough.gmane.org> <20110811064030.GB4990@host.pgf.com.pl> <CAPTjJmqiiKcT7Zg-XkbrQ4r-keU9+1Kj=+sEwa4xp==2EG-5aQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110811134613.GE4990@host.pgf.com.pl> <CAPTjJmr7qDeGU+ttEXsdBOASqZ5w1mYgkg18o+RtFp55HHp8Ew@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPTjJmr7qDeGU+ttEXsdBOASqZ5w1mYgkg18o+RtFp55HHp8Ew@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-Interia-Antivirus: OK
X-EMID: 49a0fc98
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:02:06 +0200
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: przemolicc@poczta.fm
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.2211.1313139727.1164.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 75
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1313139727 news.xs4all.nl 23915 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33584
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:11261

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 02:48:43PM +0100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM,  <przemolicc@poczta.fm> wrote:
> > This is the way I am going to use.
> > But what is the best data type to hold so many rows and then operate on=
 them ?
> >
>=20
> List of strings. [...]

Let's assume I have the whole list in the memory:
Can I use this list in the following way ?
subprocess_1 - run on list between 1 and 10000
subprocess_2 - run on list between 10001 and 20000
subprocess_3 - run on list between 20001 and 30000
etc
...
Can I use sort of indexing on this list ?


Regards
Przemyslaw Bak (przemol)



















































----------------------------------------------------------------
Doladuj telefon przez Internet!
Sprawdz >> http://linkint.pl/f2a06