Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'explicitly': 0.04; 'context': 0.05; 'cpython': 0.05; 'none,': 0.05; 'say,': 0.05; 'false,': 0.07; 'raised': 0.07; 'received:209.85.160.174': 0.07; 'undefined': 0.07; '"if': 0.09; 'accepts': 0.09; 'logger': 0.09; 'subject:while': 0.09; 'sure,': 0.09; 'terms,': 0.09; 'bug': 0.10; 'thread': 0.11; 'represents': 0.15; 'at)': 0.16; 'boolean': 0.16; 'do)': 0.16; 'interprets': 0.16; 'nameerror': 0.16; 'none"': 0.16; 'represents.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'example.': 0.17; 'obviously': 0.18; '(or': 0.18; 'windows': 0.19; 'either.': 0.22; 'explicit': 0.22; 'interpret': 0.22; 'testing': 0.24; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'guess': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; "d'aprano": 0.29; 'steven': 0.29; 'function': 0.30; '(and': 0.32; 'problem.': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'impression': 0.33; 'picking': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'false': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.36; 'depends': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'being': 0.37; 'why': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'object': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'solve': 0.62; 'truly': 0.62; 'skip:6 10': 0.63; 'states,': 0.93
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KtHGwzsn3V8viyXWQyiGAOkvcMlAxn2wWaQ+cwUj3Vk=; b=hpJEJ+P2ZroREYGYgcGjBv11T7ucFyY90KSeFpUFuchEwN45i5I1bAtpWBDVfXyCOi vSMlACfURCO/SyMeGeP2uyYlhNtaU7bTs7E41ECcybHEnInFMyhrwAD3DFWuQDgd23Kw D/31ZqWCcZbRTKUY8cu0E6xoqMzrJHcVP+omSrZMTIi+8eeUCvPAQ7qpSFQayq/bX+Hz 5MYFHAfrl+RVbrhjtXpk82vwWndtJQnHTBGGNJGmChxWm50OkNK85LLXzpbWsLAmjjxA 3SrjbEbYhkoGmBQvTRDd/xmRsaQA0w5YBTEs416mejHjynTAJqeMxw3WYd61Ligl7aei 0E9w==
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 00:19:48 -0500
From: Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "comp.lang.python" <python-list@python.org>
Subject: Re: Implicit conversion to boolean in if and while statements
References: <mailman.2132.1342341291.4697.python-list@python.org> <5002a1f9$0$29995$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.2144.1342371768.4697.python-list@python.org> <50037eab$0$29995$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <50047A84.6020208@gmail.com> <mailman.2189.1342471591.4697.python-list@python.org> <5004b543$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.2195.1342490275.4697.python-list@python.org> <5004ec84$0$11116$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>
In-Reply-To: <5004ec84$0$11116$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.2201.1342502395.4697.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 28
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1342502395 news.xs4all.nl 6868 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:51606
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:25461

On 7/16/2012 11:39 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> If you need three (or four, or fifty) 
> distinguishable states, then obviously boolean context will not solve 
> your problem. I never said it would.
That is the impression I got from this statement:

> How you interpret some_variable = None depends on what some_variable 
> represents. If some_variable represents "number of jelly beans in a jar", 
> then that should be 0 if there is no jar.
But I guess you misunderstood (or were just picking at) the example.

Of course I can (and do) explicitly use "if x is not None" when testing
for None, but I don't want a bug being obscured because "if x" accepts
an erroneous value that it interprets as truthy or falsey. I could be
explicit when testing for things other than None, but apparently that's
un-Pythonic.

To put it in duck-typing terms, why should everything have to quack like
True or False? Sure, I can see why 1 quacks like True or [] quacks like
False, but I don't see why say, a Logger or function should quack like
either. Should a Thread object be True if it's been started and False
otherwise?

If it truly is about something vs. nothing, why is a NameError (or
AttributeError) raised when testing with an undefined variable? Being
undefined quacks like nothing, doesn't it?
-- 
CPython 3.3.0b1 | Windows NT 6.1.7601.17803