Path: csiph.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed7.news.xs4all.nl!nzpost1.xs4all.net!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'properly.': 0.07; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; '*is*': 0.09; '-rf': 0.09; 'builtins': 0.09; 'operator,': 0.09; 'typeerror:': 0.09; 'url:blog': 0.10; 'do,': 0.15; '"use': 0.16; '23,': 0.16; 'attributes.': 0.16; 'eval': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'literal,': 0.16; 'stuff.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'of.': 0.18; 'skip:{ 20': 0.18; 'thanks.': 0.18; '>>>': 0.20; '2015': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'aug': 0.20; 'proposed': 0.20; '"",': 0.22; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'please?': 0.22; 'sorry,': 0.22; 'am,': 0.23; 'import': 0.24; '(most': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'module': 0.25; 'chris': 0.26; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'skip:e 30': 0.27; 'end,': 0.29; "skip:' 70": 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.30; "can't": 0.32; 'maybe': 0.33; 'traceback': 0.33; 'file': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'skip:( 30': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'means': 0.39; 'mark': 0.40; 'still': 0.40; 'easy': 0.60; 'more': 0.63; 'safe': 0.63; 'believe': 0.66; 'here': 0.66; 'talking': 0.67; 'url:r': 0.67; 'subject': 0.70; 'led': 0.72; 'yourself': 0.73; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91; 'execution,': 0.91; 'tricks.': 0.91; 'safe.': 0.93; 'url:comments': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=bhoK+sI/wbY3hChMQGEe6+OzMUXERjjfzydPE83ANYk=; b=HH6Zdw/vTf/l6yt0K2QgbAONkT6P0n1PT+NlUu60WmlOpgZeFaVZDWOWRtRKX/uH7f RCt2rvV+06yDHeQ20vSnxwyM41Lz4uZ0P6bQ4W5ebNsHKvERju4P8j6OoiZAh+nTxeTO 0lefiQc2iCxiqGkBq1lz/WG5q0dEImxW6OGrBw5bGY17HFFvQsCbxsHXySeVLacYLN7a eGIDQZC2I5IBSS6Cs4RtDNl9745YxzApf2IMakjImxwbrNTN1JsZYI8Tldm8+aBUbzvF hkOQG/PZZW7rdnGjV0vWfivhsMaiy/kd9U4zGRdxTFD6QYNTQ3cnkdpbIUoyjeH4G4pt qH5Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.32.4 with SMTP id g4mr12083203iog.31.1440288290158; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 17:04:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 10:04:50 +1000 Subject: Re: Sandboxing Python From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 65 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1440288298 news.xs4all.nl 23833 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41720 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:95572 On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 23/08/2015 00:44, Chris Angelico wrote: >> >> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Mark Lawrence >> wrote: >>> >>> I was always led to believe that the subject was a difficult thing to do, >>> but here >>> >>> https://www.reddit.com/r/learnpython/comments/3huz4x/how_to_do_math_inside_raw_input/ >>> is a safe solution in only 23 characters, or are there any discernable >>> flaws >>> in it? >> >> >> >> I'm sorry, I can't see which solution you're talking about there - >> maybe I just don't know how to read reddit properly. Can you paste the >> proposed code please? >> >> The best I can see there is "use eval but with no builtins". That's >> fundamentally flawed because you don't need builtins to break stuff. >> All you need is a literal, from which you can snag everything else via >> its attributes. >> >> However, for this situation, I would be recommending ast.literal_eval, >> which *is* safe. It's a lot more powerful than "split it into number, >> operator, number" as mentioned at the end, but still can't majorly >> break anything. >> >> ChrisA >> > > >>>> import os >>>> eval("os.system('rm -rf /')", {"__builtins__":None}) > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 1, in > eval("os.system('rm -rf /')", {"__builtins__":None}) > File "", line 1, in > TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable > > > > Surely I must I have missed your meaning because I needed just 23 characters > and zero extra lines to create a safe sandbox for this, but you've said that > the core developers have tried and failed to do this. It appears that I > didn't just wipe out my entire filesystem and you've stated quite > matter-of-factly that there is no safe solution... so what happened here? > Why didn't my filesystem just get wiped out? > Got it, thanks. The answer is: It's easy to make something you can't yourself break out of. It just means you don't know all the tricks. http://nedbatchelder.com/blog/201206/eval_really_is_dangerous.html >>> cmd="""[c for c in ().__class__.__base__.__subclasses__() if c.__name__ == 'catch_warnings'][0]()._module.__builtins__["__import__"]("os").system("echo Hello")""" >>> eval(cmd,{"__builtins__":None}) Hello 0 Et voila. Arbitrary module loading, arbitrary code execution, have fun. ChrisA