Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.111 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.79; '*S*': 0.01; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'method.': 0.07; 'dog': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'method;': 0.16; 'which,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'programming': 0.22; 'aug': 0.22; "shouldn't": 0.24; 'read,': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'too.': 0.31; 'about.': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'provide.': 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'interface': 0.32; 'classes': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'step': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'bad': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'most': 0.60; "you're": 0.61; 'provide': 0.64; 'customers': 0.66; 'walk': 0.74; 'dog.': 0.84; 'limits,': 0.84; 'careful': 0.91; 'walking': 0.91; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=pbDo+QXDnlLmpNfwvVy5VDPuEOZWnRqXNNz3+G4W1Uk=; b=vFBPOfJDAx4VjGeYye7XrIS+YkTVeOOfg7FAkAbSjbUNnfJ2u9atbwIe+GS5ArqjhR wlwvmSQNBvN6r3C9zTgvfP/L4WytJo7W6wmyC7XjM90763hHIvjG68jyaW3zp6ohvSv1 Pxut8cBhYL2Aliia8pMA6VB8bmt9mFrVAyoOfyB3VRwoSDb8pvCuNcyx7Bbq0eEhNjDW adHnilzlzNqYxceiLnRcWmGUzJq6ziHLuRQf0HZf5Ubi3iJqWNVKiDDjKnGexOKRuYnk UA4jVCm9B+Mu6WdJN1aGgWdp1su3soeFX/JPYlRukUmQAZu34rDaFNX0/7n7C1rjvhHT OgKA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.73.135 with SMTP id l7mr4830923vdv.9.1376788036684; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 18:07:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <521009ee$0$30000$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> References: <227bd47c-0e86-4d65-985f-e59aa4f25294@googlegroups.com> <520fb04f$0$30000$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <520ffe9a$0$15920$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> <521009ee$0$30000$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 02:07:16 +0100 Subject: Re: Python getters and setters From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 15 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1376788044 news.xs4all.nl 15903 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50540 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:52648 On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > The Law of Demeter is really about being careful about what interface > your classes provide. Customers should provide a get_payment method; dogs > should provide a walk method. You shouldn't have to send individual step > messages to the dog's legs. And it has its limits, too. If you're walking a dog on a leash, you don't send a message to the leash to send a message to the dog to walk. You talk directly to the dog. Like most programming principles, it's something to read, to grok, and then to think about. I have yet to find any rule which, if slavishly followed, will not lead to bad code _somewhere_. ChrisA