Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!selfless.tophat.at!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'wed,': 0.03; 'formatting': 0.07; 'terry': 0.07; '>>>>': 0.09; 'referenced': 0.09; 'skip:{ 20': 0.09; 'pm,': 0.10; '>>>': 0.12; 'am,': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; '"new': 0.16; '(before': 0.16; 'docs.': 0.16; 'from:addr:fred': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.17; 'cheers,': 0.19; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'cc:2**0': 0.22; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.23; 'string': 0.26; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'thanks': 0.28; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'nested': 0.30; 'received:209.85.212': 0.34; 'actual': 0.36; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'pretty': 0.37; 'think': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.39; 'john': 0.62; 'free': 0.63; 'received:209.85.212.178': 0.91; 'received:mail- px0-f178.google.com': 0.91 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4DEEAECB.4070601@codicesoftware.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:00:32 +0200 Subject: Re: Dynamic Zero Padding. From: Friedrich Clausen To: Terry Reedy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 27 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1307516436 news.xs4all.nl 49045 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:46323 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:7215 On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:56 AM, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 6/7/2011 7:05 PM, John Posner wrote: > >> You might want to try "new style" string formatting [1], which I think >> is better than the "old style" in this particular case: >> >> =A0 =A0 >>> "Testing {0:0{1}d}".format(42, 4) >> =A0 =A0'Testing 0042' >> =A0 =A0 >>> "Testing {0:0{1}d}".format(42, 9) >> =A0 =A0'Testing 000000042' > > One cannot use a nested field in the 'name' part of the field (before the > ':' (I tried), but are pretty free to nest in the actual specification pa= rt > after the ':'. > >>>> '{0:{1}}'.format(7,'b') > '111' >>>> '{0:{1}}'.format(7,'d') > '7' Thanks all for the many good suggestions - I am looking over them and reading the referenced docs. Cheers, Fred.