Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!cs.uu.nl!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.117 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.77; '*S*': 0.00; 'exception': 0.03; 'gpl': 0.07; 'from:addr:r.koebler': 0.16; 'from:name:roland koebler': 0.16; 'received:78.47': 0.16; 'subject:GUI': 0.16; 'versions': 0.20; 'proprietary': 0.23; 'allows': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'hi,': 0.33; 'changed': 0.34; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'quite': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'description': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'application': 0.40; 'end': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'content- disposition:inline': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'free': 0.61; 'needing': 0.62; 'situation': 0.62; 'different': 0.63; 'license': 0.65; 'subject:there': 0.65; 'commercial': 0.73 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:05:22 +0100 From: Roland Koebler To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Is there a graphical GUI builder? References: <51247EDD.3010500@gmail.com> <51259854.9040909@gmail.com> <95B0E869-C5BE-4179-BFF9-A112A128C388@rgbaz.eu> <5125F48C.6000007@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1361466325 news.xs4all.nl 6914 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36171 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:39442 Hi, > The situation has not substantively changed, but your description of > it is not really accurate. There was and still is a "commercial > license" which allows for completely proprietary development without > needing to allow end users to relink the application against > user-supplied versions of Qt. The free license is the LGPL, that's not quite correct; things have changed 2009 and Qt now has three different licenses: - commercial licence - GPL (+GPL exceptions) - LGPL + Qt LGPL Exception (because of inline-functions/templates) since Qt 4.5 best regards Roland