Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.011 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'callback': 0.09; 'received:openend.se': 0.09; 'received:theraft.openend.se': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'python': 0.11; 'cc:addr:lac': 0.16; 'cc:addr:openend.se': 0.16; 'from:addr:lac': 0.16; 'from:addr:openend.se': 0.16; 'from:name:laura creighton': 0.16; 'message-id:@fido.openend.se': 0.16; 'nowadays': 0.16; 'received:89.233': 0.16; 'received:89.233.217': 0.16; 'received:89.233.217.133': 0.16; 'received:fido': 0.16; 'received:fido.openend.se': 0.16; 'tkinter.': 0.16; 'verbose': 0.16; 'laura': 0.18; 'widget': 0.18; 'examples': 0.18; 'gui': 0.18; 'runs': 0.18; 'work,': 0.21; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.21; 'cc:2**1': 0.22; 'libraries': 0.22; 'produces': 0.22; 'tkinter': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'ago': 0.27; 'least': 0.27; 'converting': 0.27; 'heading': 0.27; 'said,': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; 'concern': 0.29; 'curve': 0.29; 'for,': 0.29; 'received:se': 0.29; 'cc:no real name:2**1': 0.29; 'there.': 0.30; 'that.': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'run': 0.32; 'similar': 0.32; 'know.': 0.34; 'could': 0.35; 'done': 0.35; 'expected': 0.35; 'being': 0.36; 'basic': 0.36; 'smaller': 0.36; 'quite': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.37; 'building': 0.38; 'is,': 0.38; 'things': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.62; 'more': 0.62; 'different': 0.64; 'smooth': 0.66; 'customers': 0.72; 'worth': 0.73; 'received:89': 0.80; 'devices,': 0.84; 'inch': 0.84; 'longest': 0.84; 'subject:good': 0.84; 'subject:tool': 0.84; 'shopping': 0.87; 'look.': 0.91; 'choice.': 0.93 To: Cecil Westerhof cc: python-list@python.org, lac@openend.se From: Laura Creighton Subject: Re: Camelot a good tool for me In-Reply-To: Message from Cecil Westerhof of "Fri, 22 May 2015 09:59:02 +0200." <87zj4xoxfd.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> References: <87zj4xoxfd.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <32746.1432299780.1@fido> Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 15:03:00 +0200 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (theraft.openend.se [89.233.217.130]); Fri, 22 May 2015 15:03:04 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 36 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1432299860 news.xs4all.nl 2910 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53655 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:91036 I don't know anything about Camelot. Tkinter produces widgets that are in no way as pretty graphically as is expected nowadays -- or indeed for at least 15 years. If this matters to you -- or if you are building for customers if it matters to them, then Tkinter is not a good choice. Widget libraries are more different than they are similar. So while learning one can give you some very basic ideas about how widgets work, and what a callback is, etc -- it doesn't smooth the learning curve for learning what it is you eventually want to use all that much. If you already know where you are heading for, then I would just start learning that. That said, most of the code I write for me, has, for the longest time used Tkinter. I don't care all that much about the ugliness, and I can write them quite quickly. How much this has to do with Tkinter programs being smaller than similar programs in other systems -- some gui toolkits are _really_ _really_ verbose -- and how much this has to do with the fact that I am familar with Tkinter I do not know. A final concern is where would you like to run these programs when you are done writing them. These days, I want most of the new things I write for me to run on my 7 inch android tablet, and Tkinter doesn't run there. About 6 months ago I started learning kivy and am using this for widgets now -- and converting some of my old programs to use kivy. Kivy works with both Python 2 and Python 3, runs on the desktop as well as in mobile devices, and produces the prettiest widgets you could ask for. It's under active development, and comes with a huge directory of examples showing how to use the various widgets. So if you are still shopping for a widget kit, it is worth a look. Laura