Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.040 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'developer.': 0.07; 'so?': 0.07; 'restriction': 0.09; 'from:addr:r.koebler': 0.16; 'from:name:roland koebler': 0.16; 'issue),': 0.16; 'received:78.47': 0.16; 'subject:GUI': 0.16; 'developer': 0.19; 'addition,': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; '(e.g.': 0.27; 'that.': 0.30; 'e.g.': 0.30; '(and': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'hi,': 0.33; 'version': 0.34; "can't": 0.34; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'skip:p 20': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'content- disposition:inline': 0.60; 'provide': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'subject:there': 0.65; 'commercial': 0.73; 'demand': 0.96 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:37:34 +0100 From: Roland Koebler To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Is there a graphical GUI builder? References: <51247EDD.3010500@gmail.com> <51259854.9040909@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51259854.9040909@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1361443063 news.xs4all.nl 6887 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42968 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:39414 Hi, > How so? It's LGPL. You can't get much freer than that. you can -- MIT/BSD/public domain etc. provide much more freedom to the developer. (And I prefer freedom for the developer over the guarantee (freedom or restriction -- call it as you wish) that nobody may lock down a copy of the sourcecode.) In addition, using the LGPL-version of Qt for proprietary/commercial software may be risky, because if you violate the LGPL by accident (e.g. because of some formal issue), the Qt-owner may demand compensation, e.g. the license-fee for the commercial Qt version for the last couple of years... regards Roland