Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!selfless.tophat.at!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.061 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.88; '*S*': 0.00; 'received:209.85.214.174': 0.14; 'received:mail-iw0-f174.google.com': 0.14; 'angelico': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'further".': 0.16; "she's": 0.16; 'algorithm': 0.16; 'level,': 0.19; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'asked': 0.24; "i'm": 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'received:209.85.214': 0.28; 'depth': 0.30; 'operation.': 0.30; "can't": 0.32; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.33; 'chris': 0.34; 'function.': 0.35; 'using': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'rapid': 0.37; 'think': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'perfectly': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; 'here.': 0.69; 'sister': 0.73; 'subject:English': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rGjA4w88N4om38Mw5Tzll1kHbgOgwXqPFcKez19fsfg=; b=dbEMZbTMIXW70laAPCqR/TuK5lKXr8ZTPvoGlAHRpi/D/TmHw2b22jIE/wo38WWJBU LZV7sYr9A61eZnbqviyOfX1mt76PWHw2OfK7wwpBQFfKlk4rWyA+ErOQcuX+L7e9/C4H bkV2zNODYHCTSnDK+htRAafy/kSnPsohVLxkg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=SKfonrlhmWnY8bu1TSU0/Fb+CYTC3WK4PIJAfME7xIPoUW2VwiGoZiZXr7itd9i2GC M9rU/PFrz/b1YoUfPwL/7qXESTDDbj7Qp9LHgC4+AvqxHk2zxNZo45DV/IVR52lu8/GQ wEa0zr1BYgmLdXlakv+dOvjBXIt7SOXMdfXuk= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4dde325f$0$67776$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> References: <4dd61066$0$29996$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <37nqa8-lpa.ln1@murmur.very.softly> <4ddaf94b$0$29996$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <4ddd898d$0$29996$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <4dde325f$0$67776$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 21:12:39 +1000 Subject: Re: English Idiom in Unix: Directory Recursively From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 15 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1306408367 news.xs4all.nl 49179 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:40106 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:6313 I just conducted a rapid poll of a non-technical userbase. (Okay, I just asked my sister who happens to be sitting here. But she's nontechnical.) She explained "recursive" as "it repeats until it can't go any further". I think that's a fair, if not perfectly accurate, explanation. Actually... if we accept that one iteration is deleting all files from one depth level, then yes, the algorithm repeats that operation. And I'm using "iteration" here without implying that it's an iterative function. Chris Angelico