Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #100527
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: geostationary satellite data |
| Date | 2015-12-17 04:08 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.21.1450285692.30845.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <mailman.11.1450280795.30845.python-list@python.org> <dddjs0Fevt5U1@mid.individual.net> |
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Peter Pearson <pkpearson@nowhere.invalid> wrote: > The file is 65274016 bytes long. You claim the dimensions are > 9896 x 3298, but that comes out to half that number (32637008), so I'll > bet the real dimensions are 9896 x 6596, with one byte per pixel. > I think this image format is called "raw". It could be 16 bits per pixel. Without knowing a lot more about the source of the image and its format, it's hard to say with any certainty. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
geostationary satellite data jorge.conrado@cptec.inpe.br - 2015-12-16 13:19 -0200
Re: geostationary satellite data Peter Pearson <pkpearson@nowhere.invalid> - 2015-12-16 17:04 +0000
Re: geostationary satellite data Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 04:08 +1100
Re: geostationary satellite data Peter Pearson <pkpearson@nowhere.invalid> - 2015-12-16 17:30 +0000
Re: geostationary satellite data Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-12-17 04:37 +1100
Re: geostationary satellite data Peter Pearson <pkpearson@nowhere.invalid> - 2015-12-16 17:53 +0000
Re: geostationary satellite data Robin Koch <robin.koch@t-online.de> - 2015-12-16 19:57 +0100
csiph-web