Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!194.109.133.85.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
To: python-list@python.org
From: Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject: Re: new string-formatting preferred? (was "What is this syntax ?")
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:17:07 -0400
References: <mailman.178.1308554725.1164.python-list@python.org>	<87pqm8qh7m.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <4DFFE9D5.30300@tim.thechases.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
In-Reply-To: <4DFFE9D5.30300@tim.thechases.com>
Precedence: list
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.209.1308622639.1164.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 48
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8056

On 6/20/2011 8:46 PM, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 06/20/2011 05:19 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>> =E2=80=9CThis method of string formatting is the new standard in
>> Python 3.0, and should be preferred to the % formatting
>> described in String Formatting Operations in new code.=E2=80=9D
>>
>> <URL:http://docs.python.org/library/stdtypes.html#str.format>
>
> Is there a good link to a thread-archive on when/why/how .format(...)
> became "preferred to the % formatting"?

That is a controversial statement.

 > I haven't seen any great wins of
> the new formatting over the classic style. Is there some great feature
> of new-style formatting that I've missed out on that obviates bajillion=
s
> of lines of 2.x code?

It does not abuse the '%' operator, it does not make a special case of=20
tuples (a source of bugs), and it is more flexible, especially=20
indicating objects to be printed. Here is a simple example from my code=20
that would be a bit more difficult with %.

multi_warn =3D '''\
Warning: testing multiple {0}s against an iterator will only test
the first {0} unless the iterator is reiterable; most are not.'''.format
=2E..
print(multiwarn('function'))
=2E..
print(multiwarn('iterator'))

Here is a more complex example:

class chunk():
	def __init__(self, a, b):
		self.a,self.b =3D a,b
c=3Dchunk(1, (3,'hi'))
print('{0.__class__.__name__} object has attributes int a <{0.a}> and=20
tuple b with members <{0.b[0]}> and <{0.b[1]}>'.format(c))
 >>>
chunk object has attributes int a <1> and tuple b with members <3> and <h=
i>

--=20
Terry Jan Reedy