Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.007 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'argument': 0.05; 'string': 0.09; 'strings.': 0.09; 'subject:keys': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; '23,': 0.16; 'identifiers': 0.16; 'identifiers.': 0.16; 'kwargs': 0.16; 'subject:Non': 0.16; 'subject:expression': 0.16; 'syntax,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'thu,': 0.19; 'print': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'keys': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'requirement': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'mapping': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'previous': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'more': 0.64; 'believe': 0.68; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=K1ZcXFIcLQaYsLuJmYb4qULoI09O2jbxVee+W234fBs=; b=GPs1bCqY9p5nFk53hEhA8DP5xZbeP89N9d0CWFBXZLumomm4Zudz48QkZc1cUTOyhs 5a7ZmHqnfgZeNE+kDGEUXHGWpxl00ISnknfwnK/rJXjASIQPaBtKjrrSJmcwzViKxdEC cnPO2ZXxrDTwq2ZILiM5YVIxXOGNIaiWvRaxkLjrPtKBz+CZ58IosrhyGt5k+2qG3qHi JCwCsnBk1Qwesstk5UZLZgD450eAHICFJ2aie1+H3cMukX7Zd2zR8aMXNG5flP1nN+5I HsD1DmDwSUoVJeyto4XkDVn4y6jiSRfkPkj0rJFw3rzTHg62t755Ptvo9axzR5SWe6EP 6LAQ== X-Received: by 10.66.230.199 with SMTP id ta7mr15361585pac.153.1369340588242; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:23:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <519E6557.6050405@gmail.com> References: <519E6557.6050405@gmail.com> From: Ian Kelly Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 14:22:28 -0600 Subject: Re: Non-identifiers in dictionary keys for **expression syntax To: Python Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 20 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1369340597 news.xs4all.nl 15888 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54848 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:45839 On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Matthew Gilson wrote: > Using Cpython, we can do the following: > > def func(**kwargs): > print kwargs > > d = {'foo bar baz':3} > > So that might lead us to believe that the keys of the mapping do not need to > be valid identifiers. However, the previous function does not work with the > following dictionary: > > d = {1:3} > > because not all the keys are strings. Is there a way to petition to get > this more rigorously defined? The string requirement is probably for optimization, but if the argument is both sent and received using the ** syntax, is there a good reason why only identifiers should be allowed?