Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'c/c++': 0.05; 'onto': 0.05; 'python)': 0.05; 'indentation': 0.07; 'subject:two': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'braces': 0.09; 'line).': 0.09; 'reason.': 0.09; 'subject:string': 0.09; 'throw': 0.09; 'pm,': 0.10; 'am,': 0.14; 'received:209.85.214.174': 0.14; 'received:mail- iw0-f174.google.com': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; '(either': 0.16; '(well,': 0.16; 'angelico': 0.16; 'aye.': 0.16; 'blender': 0.16; 'folding': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'indent': 0.16; 'pointer,': 0.16; 'subject:lines': 0.16; 'subject:split': 0.16; 'two.': 0.16; 'preference': 0.16; 'tue,': 0.17; 'please?': 0.19; 'otherwise,': 0.19; '(which': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'compared': 0.22; 'subject:code': 0.23; 'code': 0.24; "doesn't": 0.25; 'like.': 0.25; 'there.': 0.25; "i'm": 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; '(the': 0.28; 'seeing': 0.28; 'received:209.85.214': 0.28; 'facility': 0.29; 'second': 0.30; 'chase': 0.30; 'it.': 0.31; 'does': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'asking': 0.33; 'starting': 0.33; 'chris': 0.34; 'actual': 0.36; 'difference': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; '(to': 0.37; 'coding': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'run': 0.38; 'but': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.39; 'editor': 0.39; 'rest': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'your': 0.60; 'hand,': 0.74; 'bat': 0.84; 'blind': 0.84; 'dictate': 0.84; 'point:': 0.84; 'rome,': 0.84; 'staring': 0.84; 'tastes': 0.84; 'today...': 0.84; '\xa0but': 0.84; 'render': 0.91; 'visually': 0.91; 'way)': 0.91; 'subject:long': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FCdeNzHYok9qrzkXnMCHooYskGzK2V1ndzKbHD1i5MQ=; b=IW8Cv06B0o6dO2o7/NL6TRsXRsYlPyd+4Y3yDhd65psAZxVrf7STviK2dIrjdEudCc xvrDAX9eQIT3UGJDfTF2HK7DVuMIKWfM/DgormbQ/mqq3E8X/UY3VPsQSpRiC56Idtqa DAjzRZemi+4tS14NpwqfiZe92rIZfI/g93pdo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fGc83UPTPLwzV3g7B+tgiGV4hEi5NzcZ2O2RHfZtex8GXa1apsXEXl0grEGdjmrblc KTautHvrQJhgJLQCQz0pyZFClZX3fUVFNw3xMigOHhET1eFkvsuaZGY4K+shSu8kuZgL KM2G/f+6exE/Tc7SJivS+5kyhltuMnJfQrGk4= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4DF69727.9080306@tim.thechases.com> References: <4df681ae$0$2694$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it> <20110613215510.GP2322@point.cs.wisc.edu> <4DF6903F.7000101@tim.thechases.com> <4DF69727.9080306@tim.thechases.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:11:07 +1000 Subject: Re: split long string in two code lines From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 45 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1308006670 news.xs4all.nl 49181 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:54765 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:7571 On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Tim Chase wrote: > On 06/13/2011 05:38 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> I'm not seeing the difference between these two. Pointer, please? >> *puzzled* > > Sorry...tried to make that clear in the surrounding text. =A0The first on= e has > the open-paren on the same line as the starting line of content-text; the > second one just has "print (" on the first line without the text (which i= s > on the following line). Oh! Duh. I am blind as a bat today... for some reason I was staring at the close parens. >> Related point: Do you indent the ) to the same level as the opening >> quote on each line, or do you backdent it to the level of the >> statement? And, does it (either way) feel like you're writing braces >> in C? > > My personal tastes run to your first form (the close-paren at the same > indent level as the text) which makes it easy to use Vim's indent-based > folding the way I mostly like. =A0I do (well, "did"...I try to shirk C/C+= + > these days because I just feel so unproductive compared to coding in Pyth= on) > the same in my own C code for the same reason. =A0But if employer-standar= ds > dictate otherwise, when in Rome, render onto Caesar (to throw two aphoris= ms > in the blender :) Aye. Helps to have enough seniority to be able to dictate indent styles, but otherwise, you just accept it and do it. I was asking about personal preference there. Folding's a Good Thing, and even if you don't have an actual editor facility that works that way (SciTE doesn't use indentation for that IMHO), it's visually logical to go as far as the backdent. But on the other hand, the rest of Python doesn't work that way - the end of an if/for/while is the end of the indent, it doesn't include the backdented line. Choices, choices! ChrisA