Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.080 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.84; '*S*': 0.00; 'system?': 0.09; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.11; 'django': 0.11; 'gui': 0.12; 'open()': 0.16; 'subject:GUI': 0.16; 'subject:library': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'library': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; 'app': 0.19; 'module': 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; '(or': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; '>': 0.26; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'skip:- 40': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'url:mailman': 0.30; 'that.': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'regular': 0.32; 'url:python': 0.33; 'totally': 0.33; 'date:': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'url:listinfo': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'remote': 0.38; 'server': 0.38; 'files': 0.38; 'subject:': 0.39; 'embedded': 0.39; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'read': 0.60; 'future': 0.60; 'utilize': 0.61; 're:': 0.63; 'myself': 0.63; 'skip:n 10': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'benefit': 0.68; 'browser.': 0.78; 'application?': 0.84; 'ideas.': 0.84; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=z0PjsCgoTnbsFAExarlYRjiAvHE6lVCuHvf5qixmiBE=; b=ohZEQVjKAm3xzfB8fXr2NWiwUgnrDkuM4M5/0/ubOjRZ1ITg5iDUTiF+952JcY6MhQ G2KySs+/I/3bR+wXx+ZL+/UwRkS7uWriNLnlZF4tOqGSeXx509u17ZUc1kaJa4pwBPRR ldgJIw2aztE83rYenfc+zeZfu9weuAbXO0nehW99hNMye3hOhaG0mMuO1qMHvhBvU8gh nyt5EBVhnaLbE1r2hqIqkuOPtifS+MXXqAZBnzDwkxTCRu/pT+S14XL3FY2YWtXi8y/c Ev/V55ZI2Yrwg+ESWu1JAXS8Pl7t1HnW87nPyUFftke01dnv+n7cvWbv3dkOOhXSb7+R r4TA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.205.8 with SMTP id fo8mr10260962qab.62.1369292893014; Thu, 23 May 2013 00:08:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20130522154233.fe5263cb231c375fc60c7c9b@gmx.net> <19c925fc-dbf8-417c-9298-f682c9b2e558@googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 08:08:12 +0100 Subject: RE: Future standard GUI library From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=E1bio_Santos?= To: Carlos Nepomuceno Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3005dc0a7b6bd904dd5d58da Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 72 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1369294482 news.xs4all.nl 15927 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:34460 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:45784 --20cf3005dc0a7b6bd904dd5d58da Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It would be way more practical to have an embedded browser. Appjs doesn't even occupy a port on the client. We could totally benefit from that. Django applications practically make themselves. On 23 May 2013 08:02, "Carlos Nepomuceno" wrote: > You don't! If your app needs local content just use a regular open() (or > your browser) to read the files and render them as you see fit. > > For remote content you just need the 'urllib2' module or something like > 'requests' module to get the data. > > ---------------------------------------- > > Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 19:31:55 -0700 > > Subject: Re: Future standard GUI library > > From: llanitedave@veawb.coop > [...] > > > > I've been thinking about that myself for some future app ideas. If you > have a stand-alone app working from your web browser, don't you need an > embedded web server to utilize the file system? Is a system like Django for > an app overkill? Or is its embedded development server underkill for a > single-user browser-based application? > > -- > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > --20cf3005dc0a7b6bd904dd5d58da Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It would be way more practical to have an embedded browser. = Appjs doesn't even occupy a port on the client. We could totally benefi= t from that. Django applications practically make themselves.

On 23 May 2013 08:02, "Carlos Nepomuceno&qu= ot; <carlosnepomuceno@ou= tlook.com> wrote:
You don't! If your app needs local content just use a regular open() (o= r your browser) to read the files and render them as you see fit.

For remote content you just need the 'urllib2' module or something = like 'requests' module to get the data.

----------------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 19:31:55 -0700
> Subject: Re: Future standard GUI library
> From: llanitedave@veawb.coop=
[...]
>
> I've been thinking about that myself for some future app ideas. If= you have a stand-alone app working from your web browser, don't you ne= ed an embedded web server to utilize the file system? Is a system like Djan= go for an app overkill? Or is its embedded development server underkill for= a single-user browser-based application?
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
--20cf3005dc0a7b6bd904dd5d58da--