Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: empty clause of for loops Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:04:25 +0100 Organization: None Lines: 41 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de nHPzH9FOamTNrKwRjzN09wcUoru4gUL4AfUvlM0WyIkg== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'wednesday,': 0.07; 'issue:': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; "'b',": 0.16; '2016': 0.16; "['a',": 0.16; 'list)': 0.16; 'pythonic': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '>>>': 0.20; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'this?': 0.34; 'best,': 0.35; 'mine': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'hi,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'still': 0.40; 'received:de': 0.40; 'march': 0.64; 'colleague': 0.93 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57bd8b2e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: KNode/4.13.3 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:105019 André Roberge wrote: > On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 07:23:48 UTC-3, Sven R. Kunze wrote: >> Hi, >> >> a colleague of mine (I write this mail because I am on the list) has the >> following issue: >> >> >> for x in my_iterable: >> # do >> empty: >> # do something else >> >> >> What's the most Pythonic way of doing this? >> >> Best, >> Sven > > for x in my_iterable: > # do something > > if not my_iterable: > # do something else > > André This will only work for sequences: >>> items = iter("abc") >>> bool(items) True >>> list(items) ['a', 'b', 'c'] >>> bool(items) # still true... True >>> list(items) # ... but empty []