Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.118 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.77; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'received:mail-qc0-f174.google.com': 0.09; 'programmer': 0.11; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'instance:': 0.16; 'wed,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'explicit': 0.22; 'subject:Questions': 0.22; 'work,': 0.22; "i've": 0.23; 'header :In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'am,': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; 'intellectual': 0.29; 'code': 0.31; 'not.': 0.32; "who's": 0.32; '11,': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'another': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'project': 0.34; 'done': 0.34; 'clear': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'created': 0.36; 'being': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'received:209.85.216': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'easy': 0.60; 'matter': 0.61; 'different': 0.63; 'ever': 0.63; 'license': 0.65; 'jul': 0.65; 'learned': 0.65; 'risk': 0.66; 'home': 0.66; 'hand': 0.82; 'arise.': 0.84; 'subject:Interview': 0.84; 'lifting': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0CtGCHRfw2b+UmOsJgSrCtDHv0iVeyA8iLVl5NXptK8=; b=tlUoWztP6r6TpY1t+j3+MMUwBB7Y3sAkgjTeDhxQBU6WO+vexTsqqjHMIYs3XESqGI pBfSNlWiEuEe3cyxZJD9XmHFZstuw712rucIM5qlx24SWhMmGF/Wm71hIiMt26ZN510p ook9N3hvzn6lMzngsPYcMocBNiVehCc9dY0nZsnqjqGPpOisWZ1WvQfbpU78zmaijKP5 j0AGRoHFskYuN6RYBiiLsVeIrdSFvp89okdWwINeA52jm3mQGCpMyd3yq4ld0lo4YFDi hs+iM9B+hWFEDaulkGlfYJVkgJYhw80+Y8PwgejmLGn6VAZB0RBLxtCQ8Bd/vZKdqKrF Lj8g== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1193768041.349129.26350@v3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <3e0ef383-9615-4b4d-89c1-e5519971189f@googlegroups.com> <35e7a860-fd41-4018-82f6-aabc3261064d@googlegroups.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 02:05:40 +1000 Subject: Re: Python Interview Questions From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1341936344 news.xs4all.nl 6958 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54810 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:25138 On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:55 AM, BartC wrote: > There's also the risk of mixing up software created at home, with that done > at work, with all the intellectual property issues that might arise. You just make the matter clear from the beginning, for instance: what's done at work stays at work, and copyright is assigned by the act of pushing to the repository. I've lifted oddments of code from my home projects to use at work; it's no different from using skills learned at home, which is exactly what a programmer is being paid for. This is another good reason to make license terms clear and explicit on every project you ever put a hand to. Doesn't matter who's lifting code from where to where, it's easy to work out whether it's permissible or not. ChrisA