Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.175 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.84; '*S*': 0.19; 'subject:PEP': 0.07; 'happen?': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'literals': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'written': 0.21; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**1': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'patch': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "can't": 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'happen': 0.63; 'optimisation': 0.84; 'oscar': 0.84; 'carlos': 0.91; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZFSdMwSS1bAXXgP5ep4yhrVBzNZaEfA9Sd8FaBnY0qE=; b=YoE86RQm1TWpUEh0+SjBIr3GPEPc6VyEHp8W0hmhJhUzV+7k3K0/BQUKjfP6AUIfcP jBWr5Yp20xBslRmgjjAEpJWexzAzAMfn8ssvWfMx9nBSnnG+moT76CyVdCJVU5oqJ0uo NyA0i+OERL1tWpsaGVOVKjfHTeZ8ZY4v79XaNqF1Rro+T5p/8gKYBHoNB6ybpdZWbAb6 qefe5YQ0bRBkjH9ckYdP/zDAse8OcZemLThFzSIErCsxF/Gd8KI/0iHc2hPBMQ/CEx86 XQ8D+nD2Ict+TQJoRsnYyfSwsmVC9EgMhlI4t3xeqFKYsc3fTXFLkmfAt6+/q8bIOJDy 6Psg== X-Received: by 10.52.249.41 with SMTP id yr9mr3237346vdc.17.1369269073469; Wed, 22 May 2013 17:31:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <519c348a$0$6599$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <519C3D99.5040107@gmail.com> <519cdcff$0$6599$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87eaaf24-df6a-4f6b-b873-16ca96c12e24@b2g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> From: Oscar Benjamin Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 01:30:53 +0100 Subject: Re: PEP 378: Format Specifier for Thousands Separator To: Carlos Nepomuceno Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: nn , "python-list@python.org" X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 10 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1369269076 news.xs4all.nl 15905 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39203 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:45762 On 22 May 2013 23:31, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote: > > I still don't understand why % benefits from literals optimization ("'%d'%12345") while '{:d}'.format(12345) doesn't. There's no reason why that optimisation can't happen in principle. However no one has written a patch for it. Why don't you look into what it would take to make it happen? Oscar