Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.008 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'languages,': 0.03; 'skip': 0.04; 'implements': 0.05; 'perl,': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'apis': 0.07; 'compiler': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'statement.': 0.09; 'am,': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; '"free"': 0.16; 'frameworks)': 0.16; 'perl': 0.19; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'java': 0.21; 'framework': 0.22; 'from:addr:alex': 0.23; 'platforms.': 0.23; 'vs.': 0.23; '(or': 0.24; 'code': 0.24; 'somebody': 0.25; 'libraries': 0.25; 'proprietary': 0.26; "i'm": 0.27; 'correct': 0.28; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'problem': 0.28; '.net': 0.29; 'subject:?': 0.29; 'received:209.85.160': 0.29; 'can,': 0.30; 'ran': 0.30; 'sun,': 0.30; 'hi,': 0.31; 'go.': 0.32; 'received:209.85.160.46': 0.32; 'received:mail- pw0-f46.google.com': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'view,': 0.34; 'gnu': 0.35; 'languages.': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'ways': 0.37; 'platforms': 0.37; 'but': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'under': 0.40; 'worth': 0.60; 'best': 0.60; 'your': 0.60; 'freedom': 0.68; 'url:info': 0.75; 'objective': 0.77; 'compiles': 0.84; 'freely.': 0.84; 'lex': 0.84; 'noting': 0.84; 'subject:Why': 0.84; 'subject:choose': 0.84; 'subject:its': 0.84; 'good,': 0.91 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: alex@a13x.info In-Reply-To: <9CDC4B2CD1F445E994119A50F65155DF@teddy> References: <80d59383-36a3-4744-85c4-1a0577f1d3a6@dr5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <9CDC4B2CD1F445E994119A50F65155DF@teddy> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 08:52:24 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: O73dELkMwWpn-dZ4JsU8dOZ2GWE Subject: Re: Why did Quora choose Python for its development? From: Aleksandar Radulovic To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 29 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1306140748 news.xs4all.nl 49174 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:39405 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:6050 Hi, I'm going to skip the Perl vs. Python flame-bait and correct your one state= ment. On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Octavian Rasnita wrot= e: > Somebody told that C# and Objective C are good languages. They might be g= ood, but they are proprietary, and not only that they are proprietary, but = they need to be ran under platforms that cannot be used freely, so from the= freedom point of view, Perl, Ruby, Python and Java are the ways to go. Neither of those are proprietary and can, in fact, be used freely. GNU compiler compiles objective-c code with no problem and then there's Mono for C# and .NET development on multiple platforms. But if by proprietary you mean the libraries and APIs that complement those languages, the it's worth noting that Mono implements most of .NET framework and it is free. If you want "free" Cocoa APIs (or other Obj-C frameworks) look into GnuSTEP. Best regards, alex. --=20 a lex 13 x http://www.a13x.info