Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'tutorial': 0.03; 'formatting': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'received:184.172': 0.09; 'received:gator410.hostgator.com': 0.09; 'subject:language': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'language,': 0.12; 'issue?': 0.16; 'operator.': 0.16; 'outdated': 0.16; 'str.format()': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'uses,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'new,': 0.24; 'subject:will': 0.24; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'generally': 0.29; 'code': 0.31; 'quite': 0.32; 'style': 0.33; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'subject:from': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'even': 0.60; 'eventually': 0.60; 'subject:"': 0.60; 'received:173': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'received:69.56': 0.68; 'soon.': 0.71; 'subject:this': 0.83; 'received:69.56.148': 0.84; 'carlos': 0.91 Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 19:37:32 -0700 From: Ethan Furman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Myth Busters: % "this old style of formatting will eventually be removed from the language" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator410.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - python.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us X-BWhitelist: no X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: ([173.12.184.235]) [173.12.184.235]:51343 X-Source-Auth: ethan+stoneleaf.us X-Email-Count: 2 X-Source-Cap: dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3I0MTAuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 13 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1369193191 news.xs4all.nl 15904 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:43893 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:45703 On 05/21/2013 07:26 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote: > I was looking for something else and just found what I think is the place where I was first exposed to the myth[1]: > > "Since str.format() is quite new, a lot of Python code still uses the % operator. However, because this old style of formatting will eventually be removed from the language, str.format() should generally be used." > > Is this tutorial outdated or this still an issue? It was exuberant wishful thinking. ;) While .format() does have its uses, % is in wide-spread use even among the core-devs. It's not going away any time soon. -- ~Ethan~