Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!selfless.tophat.at!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.034 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.01; 'typing': 0.05; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'received:gator410.hostgator.com': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; '>>>': 0.12; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'alphabetical': 0.16; 'received:72.11': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125.166': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'versus': 0.16; 'mon,': 0.17; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'subject:?': 0.29; 'steven': 0.32; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.35; '-0700,': 0.35; "d'aprano": 0.35; 'actual': 0.36; 'difference': 0.37; 'but': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'user': 0.39; 'easier': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'more': 0.60; 'perfectly': 0.65; 'cost': 0.65; 'received:websitewelcome.com': 0.67; 'hands': 0.69; 'physical': 0.76; 'roberts': 0.84; 'speed,': 0.84; 'subject:Improve': 0.84; 'dollars': 0.88; 'was.': 0.93; 'received:gateway02.websitewelcome.com': 0.95 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:19:03 -0700 From: Ethan Furman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Keyboard Layout: Dvorak vs Colemak: is it Worthwhile to Improve the Dvorak Layout? References: <355e201c-437c-4944-9ad0-ae401df02651@22g2000prx.googlegroups.com> <4f4bv6hn40jsgpecuelejc66n7rkhv17fj@4ax.com> <26876242-ffa3-45e3-9ed7-5a40dafb1011@v10g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <4df60e5d$0$30002$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> In-Reply-To: <4df60e5d$0$30002$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator410.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - python.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us X-BWhitelist: no X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: mail.admailinc.com ([192.168.10.136]) [72.11.125.166]:2535 X-Source-Auth: ethan+stoneleaf.us X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3I0MTAuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 18 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1307991937 news.xs4all.nl 49048 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:40949 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:7550 Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 00:21:53 -0700, Elena wrote: > >> On 13 Giu, 06:30, Tim Roberts wrote: >>> Studies have shown that even a >>> strictly alphabetical layout works perfectly well, once the typist is >>> acclimated. >> Once the user is acclimated to move her hands much more (about 40% more >> for Qwerty versus Dvorak), that is. > > The actual physical cost of typing is more than dollars and cents. The difference for me is not typing speed, but my wrists. The Dvorak layout is much easier on me than the QWERTY one was. ~Ethan~