Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.032 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'python.': 0.02; 'python,': 0.02; 'subject:Python': 0.06; '(especially': 0.07; 'c++,': 0.07; 'duplicate': 0.07; '#include': 0.09; 'wrong,': 0.09; 'yeah,': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; '#undef': 0.16; 'clues': 0.16; 'printing.': 0.16; 'sys.path': 0.16; 'unexpectedly': 0.16; 'sat,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'module': 0.19; 'feb': 0.22; 'print': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header': 0.24; "haven't": 0.24; 'nearly': 0.26; 'right.': 0.26; 'least': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'file': 0.32; 'run': 0.32; 'could': 0.34; 'one,': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'c++': 0.36; 'earth': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'being': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'itself': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'dave': 0.60; 'first': 0.61; 'love': 0.65; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'between': 0.67; 'received:74.208': 0.68; 'forth': 0.81; 'life.': 0.83; '2015': 0.84; 'conflicts': 0.84; 'confusion.': 0.84; 'consequently': 0.84; 'fortunately,': 0.84; 'imagine,': 0.84; "it'd": 0.84; 'lying': 0.84; 'received:74.208.4.194': 0.84; 'reflection': 0.84; 'shadow': 0.84; 'subject:Practices': 0.84; 'angel': 0.91 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:59:04 -0500 From: Dave Angel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Python Worst Practices References: <7053A277-9687-49B0-9FDB-CB4DB3E76DEC@gmail.com> <54F0E38D.40006@davea.name> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:fUFHPxkXkXrGfP1ro8ANp8Xgbp9JWYc7WvvO1Wc6Hk+ XiMAwNVuoAEAGRbMXb7lYjdDN/RfaeRZpV5UdrKVppYVhjUIFk ZefqUZw2/NgAoyqS5raw4BjnrMi1aBa+UPJUxdeLBK9ltkK1nA QdXoTqTImfYPSGJ97ioTB2UsM+wN+ekAhIJys01HH9HA0JxQLA LnycpYkBIWUWKfAg6b//XUGQ77996sgtmoKD35wemZ/iRCist3 n4mAvi9ItaS5yqnNNRSfPJZ8Jr4f2YBmO2mqifGziCvpYXqdsf zPFNXbYTI1lXIcpkNnFTgJJuizpEPBTvxQNIDNunRdC9FKV4/z VMa2hNOZBG3z7JEalRhQ= X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 33 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1425074350 news.xs4all.nl 2976 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45604 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:86597 On 02/27/2015 04:40 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Dave Angel wrote: >> Right. In C and C++, instead of being the first slide, it'd be the first 3 >> or 4. Between header file conflicts (especially good because the stdlib >> itself has many multiply-defined symbols, duplicate header files, and >> contradictory include path patterns) > > Yeah, Python has some issues with sys.path and how your local module > can unexpectedly shadow a stdlib one, but at least the stdlib itself > doesn't have any conflicts. I should not ever have to do this dance: > > #include > #undef SOME_SYMBOL > #include > > But sadly, I do I can remember resorting to #pragmas to print out clues to include order, when recursive includes were masking what on earth was going wrong. Imagine, compile time printing. Fortunately, in Forth and Python, there's much less distinction between compile time and run time. And in Python, lots of metadata and reflection data is left lying around to be inspected in case of confusion. Don't get me wrong, I love C++, even if I don't use it the way the purists would like. But there are many warts that drive me up the wall, and consequently I avoid many features which could improve my C++ life. I haven't found nearly as many in Python. -- DaveA