Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:two': 0.07; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'received:gator410.hostgator.com': 0.09; 'subject:compare': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'am,': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'angelico': 0.16; 'batteries': 0.16; 'included"': 0.16; 'missing?': 0.16; 'received:72.11': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125.166': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:similar': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.17; 'tue,': 0.17; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'cc:2**0': 0.22; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.23; 'referring': 0.23; 'suspect': 0.25; 'subject:?': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'comment': 0.33; 'chris': 0.34; 'that,': 0.34; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.35; 'subject:What': 0.35; 'subject:lists': 0.37; 'but': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'your': 0.60; 'received:websitewelcome.com': 0.67; 'received:69.93': 0.67; '"most': 0.84; 'subject:\t': 0.93 Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:11:08 -0700 From: Ethan Furman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Angelico Subject: Re: What is the most efficient way to compare similar contents in two lists? References: <3ff2f4cc-7c26-4f59-9463-d6f0874174d8@dn9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <4df634f0$0$30002$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator410.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - python.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us X-BWhitelist: no X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: mail.admailinc.com ([192.168.10.136]) [72.11.125.166]:2515 X-Source-Auth: ethan+stoneleaf.us X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3I0MTAuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 11 NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166 X-Trace: 1307991483 news.xs4all.nl 49184 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:47491 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:7549 Chris Angelico wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:20 AM, geremy condra wrote: >> I know that, but I mean what were you talking about before if you >> weren't talking about cmp? > > Not sure what you mean. I suspect Geremy is referring to your "most of the batteries you're used to, included" comment -- which batteries are missing? ~Ethan~