Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.067 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.88; '*S*': 0.02; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'list?': 0.07; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; '7:45': 0.16; '>on': 0.16; '>that': 0.16; 'worst': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'variable': 0.18; 'thu,': 0.19; 'feb': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'case.': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'character': 0.29; 'ease': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'maintaining': 0.32; 'agree': 0.35; 'add': 0.35; 'useful': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'extremely': 0.39; '26,': 0.68; '2015': 0.84; 'complaint': 0.84; 'defensive': 0.84; 'hardly': 0.84; 'received:btcentralplus.com': 0.84; 'subject:Practices': 0.84; 'technique.': 0.84; 'received:86': 0.91; 'to:none': 0.92 User-Agent: Kaiten Mail In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: Python Worst Practices From: Simon Ward Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:36:02 +0000 CC: "python-list@python.org" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: - X-Spam-Report: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_00, MISSING_HEADERS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1424981390 news.xs4all.nl 2975 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:46219 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:86540 On 25 February 2015 21:24:37 GMT+00:00, Chris Angelico wrote: >On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Mark Lawrence > wrote: >> http://www.slideshare.net/pydanny/python-worst-practices >> >> Any that should be added to this list? Any that be removed as not >that bad? > >Remove the complaint about id. It's an extremely useful variable name, >and you hardly ever need the function. You can add one character and avoid the conflict with "id_" and not require anyone else maintaining the code to think about it. As rare as the conflict is, I think the ease of avoiding it makes the extra character a practical defensive technique. I agree it is not a worst case. Simon