Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!takemy.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'patch.': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'bug': 0.12; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'fix': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'proposed': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'looks': 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'specifically': 0.29; 'fixed': 0.29; 'url:bugs': 0.29; 'url:python': 0.33; 'community': 0.33; 'url:org': 0.36; 'wrong': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'affect': 0.61 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> Subject: Re: Bug in timsort!? Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:21:25 +0100 Organization: None References: <1cf84559-3a63-4799-a879-ae8e513d387e@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57bd95a7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: KNode/4.13.3 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 10 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1424884915 news.xs4all.nl 2870 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57616 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:86427 Mark Lawrence wrote: > Reading the bug report http://bugs.python.org/issue23515, specifically > msg236586, it looks as if the proposed fix was wrong and one of the > smarter members of the python community fixed it. If I understand that correctly Benjamin's modifications don't affect the functionality of the patch.