Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.018 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'practice,': 0.07; 'referring': 0.07; 'badly': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'blocked': 0.16; 'both,': 0.16; 'concurrent': 0.16; 'subject:? - ': 0.16; 'subject:Pypy': 0.16; 'subject:threads': 0.16; 'underlying': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; 'seems': 0.21; 'feb': 0.22; "haven't": 0.24; 'mention': 0.26; 'gets': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'resolution': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; '25,': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'ago': 0.33; 'maybe': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'though,': 0.39; 'delete': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'ian': 0.60; 'times': 0.62; 'name': 0.63; 'hours': 0.66; 'frequently': 0.68; 'gotten': 0.74; '2015': 0.84; 'subject:Are': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=E4bgiowC52mA7s0TSGCJlNqgynVYvqXr40vSLDnM0yU=; b=XEHFripeKLqZkxROwxg025jtFTvCwlW1e/72wUtmbDHky5iPXacrMzcjTPjZuzMgNz uIPjbU4c5qe3iSqUZWnz61/FIE/wA0vJOMRMsy1HZfYhpf44ATY2IYUClSOwbOS291Rp apZfKeOy0KqfgnvE24qJ17e1hKdPFoZgJqdFxCme+TGMYqRjE7x3BKeau0Zs+bT8L9qv Y3/RZyMk2To53XNpm2KLgQ+h5oQDdnBW9qaSkGmcCTQj+eCkFBh0K0yz0frspo1laBwt Xn28ZO3jyIxiv0559mom8PfR2YAZX4u8kZBkIFsZ41XUlDFV0NE5WQn7d3RcnXYlswLx aKrw== X-Received: by 10.180.89.238 with SMTP id br14mr8457093wib.68.1424883654795; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:00:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <87fv9xdb22.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <54ea7ff4$0$12983$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87zj85bcyu.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <87lhjpb89i.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <87h9udb1eq.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <87bnkkb22u.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <87lhjnang1.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <87bnkjenpp.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <8761aqamss.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> <87zj82bm15.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87pp8ybl14.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> From: Ian Kelly Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:00:14 -0700 Subject: Re: Are threads bad? - was: Future of Pypy? To: Python Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1424883662 news.xs4all.nl 2875 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45933 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:86422 On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 25/02/2015 06:02, Ian Kelly wrote: >> >> >> Is the name of that database program "Microsoft Access" perchance? >> > > Are you referring to the GUI, the underlying database engine, both, or what? The engine. In theory it supports concurrent access. In practice, it seems that access is frequently blocked by locks generated by some other user who was working on it hours ago and is now out of the office. Not to mention the times when the lock file gets so badly corrupted that the resolution is to just delete it. I haven't used it in some time though, so maybe it's gotten better.