Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'laura': 0.07; 'plenty': 0.07; 'converted': 0.09; 'creighton': 0.09; 'enormous': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'runs': 0.10; 'python': 0.11; 'language,': 0.12; '2.7': 0.14; 'backwards': 0.16; 'impractical': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'subject:Pypy': 0.16; 'so.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; '2.x': 0.24; 'planet': 0.24; 'people,': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'world,': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; '3.x': 0.31; 'breaking': 0.31; 'this.': 0.32; 'stuff': 0.32; 'quite': 0.32; 'convert': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'is.': 0.60; 'simply': 0.61; 'places': 0.64; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'worth': 0.66; 'nobody': 0.68; 'commercial': 0.71; 'received:12': 0.81; 'indefinitely': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Emile van Sebille Subject: Re: Future of Pypy? Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 09:57:06 -0800 References: of "Sun, 22 Feb 2015 12:45:03 +0000." <201502221722.t1MHM16H001195@fido.openend.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: www.westernstatesglass.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: <201502221722.t1MHM16H001195@fido.openend.se> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 20 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1424800651 news.xs4all.nl 2843 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:43191 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:86339 On 2/22/2015 9:22 AM, Laura Creighton wrote: > There was, and still is, an enormous amount of resentment about this. > For a lot of people, the perception was, and still is that the benefits > of Python 3.x over Python 2.x was not worth breaking backwards > compatibility. And there still are plenty of places whose plan is > to use Python 2.7 indefinitely into the far future. I've got 15 > years worth of commercial python code out there in the world, and > nobody wants it converted enough to pay me to do so. Their position > is that it runs quite well enough as it is. I'm sure not > going to convert the stuff for fun. Practically every Python consultant on > the planet is in the same boat. +1 As a glue language, it's simply impractical to reapply the glue. Emile