Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.027
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.95; '*S*': 0.00; '+0100,': 0.07; 'am,': 0.14; 'wrote:': 0.14; 'accepting.': 0.16; 'angelico': 0.16; 'docstring': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'obvious.': 0.16; 'meant': 0.18; 'subject:list': 0.19; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.21; 'figure': 0.21; 'body.': 0.23; 'received:209.85.210.174': 0.23; 'received:mail- iy0-f174.google.com': 0.23; 'certainly': 0.25; 'function': 0.25; 'object': 0.26; 'says': 0.27; 'example': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'lee': 0.29; 'sat,': 0.29; 'true,': 0.29; 'nested': 0.30; 'sun,': 0.30; 'sort': 0.31; 'steven': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'comment': 0.33; 'chris': 0.34; "d'aprano": 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.37; 'but': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'sometimes': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'almost': 0.60; 'below': 0.61; 'john': 0.62; 'making': 0.67; '(your': 0.84; 'calls,': 0.84; 'realistic': 0.93
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0jSe/g4CaDOXxSJWJAh2xUk+3JdyjdJvBE8w47y9t3M=; b=bc/KSwMBBC939IbJKF4nEtKWrfHZLz4alGVxI4K3ArSrnrJs7bJG2rZjF4ES3qBCzL uTB9bMMOU0jYj3n5Mk3q3PRHpW5IkYy8j+SlvaKX8IFUUEsydJVBYW5I44FlHhF7jGEa uaDBztADLBVZTtlMivov9jq0kMp7hN0ZGgP80=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=lAXt8o+F6XJKSxkEojwaJY5zrHay1+9UbxEnXCxwAnFj3I3iTq9oAozmZI9uH8OsCP LaIRlIoNoo8sEedNuLliHK11txirMP8uAUJ7plfzY1LQH4ThDUoPwEkuYwitwu2mzHoT kHVNqybPhz1JYAxuDfkXWJNVnAPDuOQAt7Wag=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4dd860a1$0$29996$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
References: <BANLkTikF18n2dBU6hhFngcAPkE2ZpErVAw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimWdAijp6vWm9sC_9rFMgpoRf35Hg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.1260.1304710333.9059.python-list@python.org> <9hYwp.5805$xo2.3333@newsfe07.iad> <mailman.1266.1304712384.9059.python-list@python.org> <4dc4b351$0$29991$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <uk0q98-446.ln1@svn.schaathun.net> <4dca90c1$0$29980$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <hchq98-mi6.ln1@svn.schaathun.net> <930j6nFi2lU1@mid.individual.net> <87r57s6riu.fsf@pobox.com> <4dd860a1$0$29996$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 12:56:03 +1000
Subject: Re: checking if a list is empty
From: Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
To: python-list@python.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.1898.1306032972.9059.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 16
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.94.164.166
X-Trace: 1306032972 news.xs4all.nl 49181 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:59900
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:5949

On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 May 2011 15:46:01 +0100, John J Lee wrote:
>
> Er, yes? But in any realistic example (your trivial function xyzzyx below
> is not very realistic) you'll almost certainly get additional hints in
> the function body.

True, but sometimes those hints will be buried in nested calls, making
it less obvious. It might well take some digging to figure out just
what sort of object it's meant to be accepting. That's why I prefer to
have some sort of type declarations; or alternatively, a good
docstring / autodoc comment that says what the function wants and
gives.

Chris Angelico