Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.007 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'interfaces': 0.04; 'anyway.': 0.05; 'argument': 0.05; 'classes,': 0.05; 'output': 0.05; 'mouse': 0.07; 'transform': 0.07; 'friday,': 0.09; 'methods,': 0.09; 'developer': 0.10; 'mostly': 0.14; 'times,': 0.14; 'blocks': 0.16; 'bryan': 0.16; 'collapse': 0.16; 'constructs': 0.16; 'duarte': 0.16; 'eric,': 0.16; 'form),': 0.16; 'formatting,': 0.16; 'frankly': 0.16; 'jacob': 0.16; 'navigating': 0.16; 'received:opentransfer.com': 0.16; 'say.': 0.16; 'tab': 0.16; 'elements': 0.16; ':-)': 0.16; 'do,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'obviously': 0.18; 'trying': 0.19; 'possible,': 0.19; 'seems': 0.21; 'comfortable': 0.22; 'driven': 0.24; 'keyboard': 0.24; 'looks': 0.24; '---': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'developers': 0.25; 'developing': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; "we'd": 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'character': 0.29; 'generally': 0.29; 'cool': 0.30; 'india.': 0.30; 'primarily': 0.30; 'url:mailman': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'posting': 0.31; 'disabled': 0.31; 'mirror': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'interface': 0.32; "we're": 0.32; 'another': 0.32; 'quite': 0.32; 'text': 0.33; 'url:python': 0.33; '-----': 0.33; 'development.': 0.33; 'programmers': 0.33; 'maybe': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'accessible': 0.36; 'url:listinfo': 0.36; 'doing': 0.36; 'shows': 0.36; 'useful': 0.36; 'thanks': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'effort': 0.37; 'list': 0.37; 'level': 0.37; 'easily': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'thank': 0.38; 'audio': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'issue': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'subject:': 0.39; 'environment.': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'address.': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'space': 0.40; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'number,': 0.60; 'received:unknown': 0.61; 'challenge': 0.61; 'took': 0.61; 'simple': 0.61; 'times': 0.62; 'hearing': 0.63; 'information': 0.63; 'name': 0.63; 'high': 0.63; 're:': 0.63; 'kind': 0.63; 'such': 0.63; 'provide': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'relatively': 0.65; 'contact': 0.67; 'yes': 0.68; '20,': 0.68; 'guided': 0.68; 'results': 0.69; '2015': 0.84; 'piping': 0.84; 'recognition': 0.84; 'speech': 0.84; 'unique.': 0.84; 'beneficial': 0.91; 'thing,': 0.91 Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=blindza.co.za; s=dkim-shared; x=1425062366; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject: Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=afm GiwnTQ4sNWn5D/vJix5s+dFaOUro5qlts/dlDunw=; b=eqy8TJnqVCvypNf/Kg2 YYcYFNSxAeS4J9ndXLXPQ/Z4wf0KYhyFIO5AW9UNSw40P6OxA5CkHYzAIXHCrMTS ZbVydnDEUQXYQd5QCu5E6Z6vCznXXHA/bRNFXrxZsldUEjMkrC0ru3sAxBEqD88Y R1TpDZI40As5D6LIDp1Eonz0= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dkim-shared; d=blindza.co.za; h=Received:Received:X-Originating-IP:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=YFZfLl/QM55koOrVc3pqxS7+OuRjBdZ7m/UZKT6JZApiDOI4eAa5z1xrTD7bIT my1xXgtxCv9zsG0x+LzJShERcpumNiGOu7BtzpfB36U4YvvagBcmvSJe0n78FOAR CnBvNux1RUfnFe0X5RFgG7YuYdKxtZPuC2MTiqbQd7jmg=; X-Originating-IP: 105.236.113.62 From: "Jacob Kruger" To: Subject: Re: Accessible tools Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 20:39:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 76 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1424457571 news.xs4all.nl 2921 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37175 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:85986 Eric, issue is that with screenreaders, we're generally way more into navigating code and interface character by character/by keyboard, so , yes, keeping interface relatively simple is a good thing, but, we also would prefer to primarily keep all interface elements to make use of standard UI controls, and make sure tab index/order is suitable/relevant at times, etc. etc. As in, I think we'd primarily want to avoid having to use a mouse at all if possible, but anyway. Stay well Jacob Kruger Blind Biker Skype: BlindZA "Roger Wilco wants to welcome you...to the space janitor's closet..." ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric S. Johansson" To: Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 7:22 PM Subject: Re: Accessible tools > > On 2/19/2015 10:33 AM, Bryan Duarte wrote: >> Thank you jwi, and Jacob, >> >> I took a look at that posting and it seems pretty unique. I am not much >> interested in the speech driven development, but I am very interested in >> developing an accessible IDE. > > Well you should be because it looks like an aural interface (uses speech > instead of keyboards) uses the same kinds of data to present to either a > text to speech or speech recognition driven environment. >> A professor and I have been throwing around the idea of developing a >> completely text based IDE. There are a lot of reasons this could be >> beneficial to a blind developer and maybe even some sighted developers >> who are comfortable in the terminal. The idea would be really just to >> provide a way of easily navigating blocks of code using some kind of >> tabular formatting, and being able to collapse blocks of code and hearing >> from a high level information about the code within. All tools and >> features would obviously be spoken or output in some kind of audio manor. > I've been working with another professor working on some of these issues > as well. His focus has been mostly blind young adults in India. come up > with some pretty cool concepts that looks very usable. The challenge now > is to make them work and, quite frankly monetize the effort to pay for the > development. > > Again, this shows the similarities in functionality used by both speech > recognition and text-to-speech. All I care about is text and what I can > say. We're now working with constructs such as with-open, argument by > number, plaintext symbol names (with bidirectional transform to and from > code form), guided construct generation for things like classes, methods, > comprehensions etc. > > All of these things would be useful to handed programmers as well as a way > of accelerating co-creation and editing. Unfortunately, like with disabled > people stove piping text-to-speech versus speech recognition, handed > developers stovepipe keyboard interfaces and don't really think about what > they are trying to do, only how they are doing it. > > Yes yes, it's a broadbrush that you can probably slap me with. :-) >> >> Oh and before I forget does anyone know how to contact Eric who was >> developing that accessible speech driven IDE? Thanks > > Well, you could try looking in a mirror and speaking my name three times > at midnight But you would get better results if you used my non-mailing > list email address. esj@eggo.org. > > --- eric > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >