Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.albasani.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!bcyclone05.am1.xlned.com!bcyclone05.am1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.096 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.81; '*S*': 0.00; 'explanation': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'from:addr:cs': 0.16; 'from:addr:zip.com.au': 0.16; 'from:name:cameron simpson': 0.16; 'message-id:@cskk.homeip.net': 0.16; 'simpson': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'else,': 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**1': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'deleted.': 0.24; 'skip': 0.24; 'tracker': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'open': 0.33; 'message.': 0.35; "can't": 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'skip:> 10': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'being': 0.38; 'issue': 0.38; 'break': 0.61; 'simple': 0.61; 'content-disposition:inline': 0.62; 'offer': 0.62; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'production': 0.68; 'dr.': 0.77; '(while': 0.84; 'cc:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.84; 'received:192.168.15': 0.84 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:40:38 +1100 From: Cameron Simpson To: Skip Montanaro Subject: Re: tempfile mktemp function MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) References: Cc: Mark Lawrence , Python X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 13 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1424144441 news.xs4all.nl 2837 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36722 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl X-Received-Bytes: 3183 X-Received-Body-CRC: 3970810414 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:85731 On 16Feb2015 20:24, Skip Montanaro wrote: >I can't offer an explanation, but you might open an issue in the tracker >proposing that it be removed in 3.5. If nothing else, you should get an >authoritative-ish explanation for why it has yet to be deleted. It may be as simple as still being in system C libraries, so people are reluctant to break off access to it (while still discouraging it). Just conjecture, Cameron Simpson No electrons were harmed in the production of this message. - Dr. P. Gensheimer