Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.043 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.91; '*S*': 0.00; 'curious.': 0.09; 'subject:files': 0.09; 'wed,': 0.12; 'am,': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.15; 'libc': 0.16; 'received:192.168.1.40': 0.16; 'possibly': 0.16; 'linux': 0.18; 'aug': 0.19; 'interesting.': 0.19; "doesn't": 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'gnu': 0.23; '(and': 0.27; 'seeing': 0.28; 'implement': 0.33; 'usually': 0.33; 'actually': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.34; 'quite': 0.34; 'installed': 0.35; 'probably': 0.35; 'install': 0.36; 'received:192': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'received:192.168.1': 0.39; 'except': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'called': 0.40; 'you.': 0.62; 'received:62': 0.67; 'discovered': 0.69; 'from:addr:t': 0.84; 'manuals': 0.84; 'readily': 0.93 Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:49:22 +0200 From: Thomas Jollans User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110628 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Hardlink sub-directories and files References: <3d2c3d3b-085e-4f3b-903d-726a31e607f4@b34g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <4E37CDCF.7060501@jollybox.de> <4E391933.6070603@jollybox.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2 OpenPGP: id=5C8691ED Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 27 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1312397352 news.xs4all.nl 23922 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53128 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:10822 On 03/08/11 18:29, Dan Stromberg wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Thomas Jollans > wrote: > > Is it more portable? I don't actually have cpio installed on this > system. > > > Interesting. Of course, it's probably readily available to you. What > *ix are you seeing that doesn't include cpio by default? Arch Linux - the base install is quite minimal. I just discovered that I have a program called bsdcpio which is used by mkinitcpio (and possibly other system scripts); no need for the GNU cpio. Curious. > > > Which implementations of cp don't implement -R and -l? > > > Probably most of them, except GNU and newer BSD. Okay. While GNU libc manuals usually document how portable functions are in detail, that's not true for the GNU coreutils manuals. Thomas