Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: Curious Omission In New-Style Formats
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:54:34 -0400
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <mailman.186.1468263287.2295.python-list@python.org>
References: <834b1cce-38dd-474c-8915-4ff1cd6b27ec@googlegroups.com> <CALwzidmwcc0nTLtLBJm=JNAjOQNRe2umtmNXNAk=s+xoyxhU6Q@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.161.1468135349.2295.python-list@python.org> <7fcc8c21-106f-41d4-a5ba-409f3b54a56d@googlegroups.com> <CALwzidkiRh2+ttXewaQzyJhAKMjTb7AXYk=E2SxGyH_jw9o1gw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.180.1468249505.2295.python-list@python.org> <5783c91e$0$1622$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <5783D63F.5040307@stoneleaf.us> <nm0q1c$gtk$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
In-Reply-To: <5783D63F.5040307@stoneleaf.us>
Precedence: list
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:111284

On 7/11/2016 1:24 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 07/11/2016 09:28 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 01:04 am, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
>> Er, what? I count *five* digits in "00123", not three.
>>
>> You seem to be assuming that "precision" can only refer to digits
>> after the
>> decimal place, but that's a dubious proposition.
>
> I will readily admit to not having a maths degree, and so of course to
> me saying the integer 123 has a precision of 5, 10, or 99 digits seems
> like hogwash to me.

I do have an undergraduate degree in math and a career in statistics, 
and I cannot remember seen 'precision' used in relation to integers.  So 
I would call it a 'non-standard extension' of the notion.

> But I'm always willing to learn.  So please explain what 123 with a
> precision of five integer digits means,

What it could mean is that we have an count selected from the range 
00000 to 99999 inclusive.  But what I just said is the usual way of 
saying that, as it does not limit the lower and upper limits to 0s and 9s.

> and what to do we gain by saying such a thing?

Confusion.

Precision is usually used in reference to measurement, and while 
measurement is based on counting, it is not the same thing.  If 123 is a 
count, then its precision is 1 count, not k digits.  Or one could say 
that all digits are precise. What is ambiguous without context is 
whether counts with trailing 0s, like 120 or 100 are exact or rounded. 
100, as a cound, could have a precision of 1, 2, or 3 (significant) 
digits.  Context sometimes says things like 'to the nearest hundred 
thousand'.

In any case, I think it an improvement to say that '0x00123' has a field 
width of 7 rather than a 'precision' of 5.

 >>> '{:#07x}'.format(0x123)  # specifiy field width
'0x00123'
 >>> "%#0.5x" % 0x123  # specify int precision
'0x00123'

Thus, my title for a post noting the same change might be "Upgrade in 
new-style formats".
(format and If one want leading 0s,

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy