Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:30:55 +1000
From: Simon Cropper <simoncropper@fossworkflowguides.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Apology for OT posts
References: <mailman.1623.1340939177.4697.python-list@python.org> <6c39594f-79cb-4d4f-967e-bbc3f68cdbdf@f8g2000pbf.googlegroups.com> <4fed59b7$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.1631.1340982202.4697.python-list@python.org> <EaAHr.369967$of1.132220@fx06.am4> <CAH8GtdMUdrpK=O5fXSBs1Xn8CmA4qZiCqN8+PJ=CZnv8jJCYUg@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzidn=8E_rvx1xdwEEx4tgz8-7ZgHnbXt65JefG=q4xkoR3Q@mail.gmail.com> <16ab546d-79e8-4d9a-9f8b-a28494d885f7@email.android.com> <CAPTjJmrGmPajNKXsgTCUXwn3MbctGHysBcE-3BpfrjRuocgkWA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF3CCCD.8070309@fossworkflowguides.com> <4FF3D708.6090405@tysdomain.com> <20120706120635.7d2f27547d8056a066dc9342@johnohagan.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120706120635.7d2f27547d8056a066dc9342@johnohagan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.1850.1341552670.4697.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 52
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:24956

On 06/07/12 12:06, John O'Hagan wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 23:39:20 -0600
> "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/3/2012 10:55 PM, Simon Cropper wrote:
>>> Some questions to Tyler Littlefield, who started this thread.
>>>
>>> Q1 -- Did you get any constructive feedback on your code?
>>
>> I did get some, which I appreciated. someone mentioned using PyLint.
>>   From reading, I found it was really really pedantic, so I used PyFlakes
>> instead.
>>>
>>> Q2 -- Did you feel that the process of submitting your code for review
>>> met your expectation?
>>
>> There wasn't much more to review, so yes. The info I got was helpful and
>> farther than it was before I started.
>>
>>> Q3 -- Would you recommend others doing this either on this forum or
>>> other fora?
>>>
>>> It appears to me - third party watching the ongoing dialog - that the
>>> tread has gone right off topic (some time ago) and someone should
>>> really start a new thread under a new title/subject. Most of what I
>>> have read does not appear to be discussing your code or how you could
>>> improve your code.
>>>
>> I basically just stopped after a while. It got into a my language is
>> better than your language, so I didn't see much constructive info. I've
>> started reading from the bottom though, where it looks like it's back,
>> and I do appreciate the rest of the info given, as well. Thanks again
>> for the feedback.
>>
>
> As one of the perpetrators, I did apologise for being OT within the body of my
> replies to OT posts, but I see the irony. I guess I just thought somebody else
> would do it eventually. I hereby apologise for not taking the correct action,
> and vow to do so in future: to change the subject line regardless of who
> initially went OT, starting now.
>
> Regards,
> --
> John
>

thanks :)

bet this kills the conservation though...

Simon