Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Chris Angelico Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: subprocess check_output Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 09:01:45 +1100 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <20151230210227.GA88234@cskk.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de UHyDJH/l69QXDyAN6JWGwQIEEpe9XcnyNlLVDJZZrxew== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.031 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'effect.': 0.09; 'file"': 0.09; 'bug': 0.10; 'python': 0.10; 'jan': 0.11; '2016': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '(in': 0.18; 'shell': 0.18; 'changes': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'suggested': 0.20; 'am,': 0.23; 'forgot': 0.23; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'command': 0.26; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'turns': 0.27; 'idea': 0.28; 'run': 0.33; 'running': 0.34; 'server': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'problem.': 0.35; 'there': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; "wasn't": 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'received:209.85.213': 0.37; 'thought': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.38; 'wrong': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; 'test': 0.39; 'still': 0.40; 'save': 0.60; 'your': 0.60; 'spam.': 0.61; 'times': 0.63; 'worth': 0.67; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'heh.': 0.84; 'succeeds': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91; 'carlos': 0.91; 'smoke': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=gbLCom4mALhQSX1Hl3MNQqwhPB4GWjMGEfU6wLEyUG8=; b=ydu5GNCnpF6X5F85Dy2RjJsQwZS8/xbypfE00Q2Mc26xFKWMfM5w3ngYC0JY1UaV17 AK0t0wNolhh4hXkz5zJ50kFcv4aGwQCCskCcvyuCAT6fbMHZxL3KBD3nO8ZpJbkS14sA rZLjm7SMCFoq+ZjTQLgMV1x7k0R/w9tuXag/xI/ZteUDKRlctpYXFgr8eCCRXdnYllr2 y5sBVysT4igqssylrZfbfQraVHWrGj4gZhfkkI7Z6zi/y06ZSsYOHf7G7E3RQAdb/U8U YHiSQQSXxKCkVOf3A4wUdBftCPFuSCfFezSvCyn77mx+y3av/6CLWSzB/pWp3a+Qn8Aj oc7A== X-Received: by 10.50.66.179 with SMTP id g19mr60647503igt.94.1451772105702; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 14:01:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:101174 On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Carlos Barera wrote: > Turns out it wasn't running against the server I thought it was. > Apologies for the spam. Heh. No problem. That's part of why I suggested running it from the shell. There are two possibilities: either it also fails from the shell (in which case you've eliminated Python as the problem, and can concentrate on "why is my command not working"), or it succeeds when run manually and still fails from Python (in which case you can start investigating the differences). And every now and then, it's worth doing a stupid smoke test just to see if your changes are even having effect. You have no idea how many times a bug investigation has come down to "whoops, I forgot to save the file" or "whoops, I was in the wrong directory"... ChrisA