Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'result,': 0.07; 'literal': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; 'bytecode': 0.16; 'cases)': 0.16; 'characters:': 0.16; 'created;': 0.16; 'cryptic': 0.16; 'least)': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'tuple': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'another': 0.32; 'yield': 0.36; 'list': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; "you're": 0.61; 'confusing': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> Subject: Re: meaning of: line, = Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 18:36:48 +0100 Organization: None References: <07f4498c-7917-4315-85d4-73283a830f2d@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57bd8968.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: KNode/4.13.3 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 23 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1423071418 news.xs4all.nl 2906 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:39168 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:85227 Rustom Mody wrote: > Well its cryptic and confusing (to me at least) > And is helped by adding 2 characters: > > (result,) = f() > > instead of > > result, = f() Another alternative is to put a list literal on the lefthand side: >>> def f(): yield 42 ... >>> [result] = f() >>> result 42 (If you're worried: neither the list nor the tuple will be created; the bytecode is identical in both cases)