Sender: "John O'Hagan" <johnmohagan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 12:06:35 +1000
From: John O'Hagan <research@johnohagan.com>
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Apology for OT posts (was: code review)
In-Reply-To: <4FF3D708.6090405@tysdomain.com>
References: <mailman.1623.1340939177.4697.python-list@python.org> <6c39594f-79cb-4d4f-967e-bbc3f68cdbdf@f8g2000pbf.googlegroups.com> <4fed59b7$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.1631.1340982202.4697.python-list@python.org> <EaAHr.369967$of1.132220@fx06.am4> <CAH8GtdMUdrpK=O5fXSBs1Xn8CmA4qZiCqN8+PJ=CZnv8jJCYUg@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzidn=8E_rvx1xdwEEx4tgz8-7ZgHnbXt65JefG=q4xkoR3Q@mail.gmail.com> <16ab546d-79e8-4d9a-9f8b-a28494d885f7@email.android.com> <CAPTjJmrGmPajNKXsgTCUXwn3MbctGHysBcE-3BpfrjRuocgkWA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF3CCCD.8070309@fossworkflowguides.com> <4FF3D708.6090405@tysdomain.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.1845.1341540406.4697.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 44
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.stben.net!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:24952

On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 23:39:20 -0600
"Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> wrote:

> On 7/3/2012 10:55 PM, Simon Cropper wrote:
> > Some questions to Tyler Littlefield, who started this thread.
> >
> > Q1 -- Did you get any constructive feedback on your code?
> 
> I did get some, which I appreciated. someone mentioned using PyLint. 
>  From reading, I found it was really really pedantic, so I used PyFlakes 
> instead.
> >
> > Q2 -- Did you feel that the process of submitting your code for review 
> > met your expectation?
> 
> There wasn't much more to review, so yes. The info I got was helpful and 
> farther than it was before I started.
> 
> > Q3 -- Would you recommend others doing this either on this forum or 
> > other fora?
> >
> > It appears to me - third party watching the ongoing dialog - that the 
> > tread has gone right off topic (some time ago) and someone should 
> > really start a new thread under a new title/subject. Most of what I 
> > have read does not appear to be discussing your code or how you could 
> > improve your code.
> >
> I basically just stopped after a while. It got into a my language is 
> better than your language, so I didn't see much constructive info. I've 
> started reading from the bottom though, where it looks like it's back, 
> and I do appreciate the rest of the info given, as well. Thanks again 
> for the feedback.
> 

As one of the perpetrators, I did apologise for being OT within the body of my
replies to OT posts, but I see the irony. I guess I just thought somebody else
would do it eventually. I hereby apologise for not taking the correct action,
and vow to do so in future: to change the subject line regardless of who
initially went OT, starting now.

Regards,
--
John