Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'precedence': 0.09; 'yeah,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; "wouldn't": 0.11; 'from:addr:cs': 0.16; 'from:addr:zip.com.au': 0.16; 'from:name:cameron simpson': 0.16; 'message-id:@cskk.homeip.net': 0.16; 'oct': 0.16; 'received:202.125.174': 0.16; 'received:202.125.174.133': 0.16; 'received:boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au': 0.16; 'received:cskk.homeip.net': 0.16; 'received:edu.au': 0.16; 'received:harvey.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au': 0.16; 'received:homeip.net': 0.16; 'received:nsw.edu.au': 0.16; 'simpson': 0.16; 'subject:expression': 0.16; 'subject:regular': 0.16; 'wed,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'accepted.': 0.27; 'regular': 0.27; 'group:': 0.29; 'probably': 0.29; 'pm,': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'wanted': 0.36; 'received:au': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'why': 0.37; 'content-disposition:inline': 0.60; 'share': 0.61 Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 15:22:28 +1000 From: Cameron Simpson To: Ian Kelly Subject: Re: + in regular expression MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) References: Cc: Python X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 13 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1349414969 news.xs4all.nl 6873 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:48354 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:30781 On 03Oct2012 21:17, Ian Kelly wrote: | On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:01 PM, contro opinion wrote: | > why the "\s{6}+" is not a regular pattern? | | Use a group: "(?:\s{6})+" Yeah, it is probably a precedence issue in the grammar. "(\s{6})+" is also accepted. -- Cameron Simpson Disclaimer: ERIM wanted to share my opinions, but I wouldn't let them. - David Wiseman