Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.030 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'check.': 0.09; 'minus': 0.09; 'solution,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; '12:57': 0.16; 'subject:values': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'thu,': 0.17; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'am,': 0.27; 'first,': 0.27; 'guess': 0.27; 'thoughts': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.28; 'received:209.85.160.46': 0.32; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'jason': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'anything': 0.36; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'jul': 0.65; 'unusual': 0.71; 'notion': 0.84; 'imagine': 0.96 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=wBQoLtOMhekq9ewr1aYDMQX6P+u/K7ZA5k7moX1BGDs=; b=C+cZ7DgP0dTXS5xYto3LazL5lhiFEWxKTp4bMMwNGr58zVraxSjqbkY6Zs7Ia/SOfH +kDavFLQsw7NAFRe8DisyBz8lCDw1QkS3iC8Rf2VZ9tCPnzWiktW3oLsnDt4NyB/E7oK lKmVkIQRj0kumapEtFF78eYptH+mMOzEyQRV+CplXTcWYkSVlzqlMQf570iyWBg80qLI LWKSYfuaVKRuWNJyk3NczeBvK+gO812ZKNkgvS0fcDT+EzYWCLmeyKDcU/FXkrfQdRxz 9fSUB+MmEKw7TOD2TKQGnfI/3LYUEi8w4IzJHvblXbA/faTt0OdvhdSlU695OZczFFTM 2UQg== MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Devin Jeanpierre Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 01:05:45 -0400 Subject: Re: simpler increment of time values? To: Jason Friedman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 11 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1341464789 news.xs4all.nl 6907 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42691 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:24896 On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Jason Friedman wrote: > I have some thoughts on a solution, but first, what is 12:45 plus 12 > hours? What is 12:45 minus 13 hours? Is there anything unusual that can happen for a notion of time that is dateless, timezone-unaware, and DST-free? I would imagine that under these constraints the answers are always 0:45 and 23:45 respectively. Although I guess it doesn't hurt to check. -- Devin