MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <54C3EAD1.2010501@stoneleaf.us>
References: <CAPTjJmrAQgtauH74dwCzb_-6T09D0dLVkxiGrAxJMp_OOwgS0g@mail.gmail.com> <54C3EAD1.2010501@stoneleaf.us>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 06:55:49 +1100
Subject: Re: Alternative to multi-line lambdas: Assign-anywhere def statements
From: Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Cc: "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Precedence: list
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.18094.1422129357.18130.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 28
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!bete-des-vosges.org!feed.ac-versailles.fr!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:84487

On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote:
> If the non-generic is what you're concerned about:
>
> # not tested
> dispatch_table_a = {}
> dispatch_table_b = {}
> dispatch_table_c = {}
>
> class dispatch:
>   def __init__(self, dispatch_table):
>     self.dispatch = dispatch_table
>   def __call__(self, func):
>     self.dispatch[func.__name__] = func
>     return func
>
> @dispatch(dispatch_table_a)
> def foo(...):
>    pass

That's still only able to assign to a key of a dictionary, using the
function name. There's no way to represent fully arbitrary assignment
in Python - normally, you can assign to a name, an attribute, a
subscripted item, etc. (Augmented assignment is a different beast
altogether, and doesn't really make sense with functions.) There's no
easy way to say "@stash(dispatch_table_a['asdf'])" and have that end
up assigning to exactly that.

ChrisA