Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <tundra@tundraware.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'third-party': 0.04; 'base.': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'see.': 0.07; 'socket': 0.07; '22,': 0.09; 'pgp': 0.09; 'scripting': 0.09; 'sure,': 0.09; 'tcp/ip': 0.09; 'toolkit': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'gui': 0.12; 'jan': 0.12; 'wrote': 0.14; 'useful,': 0.14; '(it': 0.16; '(there': 0.16; 'bsd': 0.16; 'command-line': 0.16; 'does,': 0.16; 'higher-level': 0.16; 'services;': 0.16; "where's": 0.16; 'discussions': 0.16; 'so.': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'thu,': 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'unicode': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'sort': 0.25; 'handling': 0.26; 'least': 0.26; 'developing': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'installed': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'tim': 0.29; 'code': 0.31; 'that.': 0.31; 'base,': 0.31; 'behind.': 0.31; 'further?': 0.31; 'libraries': 0.31; 'lot.': 0.31; 'anyone': 0.31; 'critical': 0.32; 'languages': 0.32; 'basic': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'mass': 0.36; 'behind': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'today?': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'sure': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'most': 0.60; 'new': 0.61; 'back': 0.62; 'networking': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'obvious': 0.74; '1990s,': 0.84; '2015': 0.84; 'etc,': 0.84; 'rexx,': 0.84; 'technically': 0.84
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:51:04 -0600
From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
To: Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What killed Smalltalk could kill Python
References: <54bfd513$0$12978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <spp5pb-0tt1.ln1@ozzie.tundraware.com> <mailman.17932.1421884530.18130.python-list@python.org>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.17932.1421884530.18130.python-list@python.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:51:04 -0600 (CST)
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: t0NMp4oG096526
X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com
X-Spam-Status: No
Cc: "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Message-ID: <mailman.18065.1422053606.18130.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 29
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1422053606 news.xs4all.nl 2927 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53231
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:84414

On 01/21/2015 05:55 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> wrote:
>> I find these kinds of discussions sort of silly.  Once there is a critical
>> mass of installed base, no language EVER dies.
> 
> Not sure about that. Back in the 1990s, I wrote most of my code in
> REXX, either command-line or using a GUI toolkit like VX-REXX. Where's
> REXX today? Well, let's see. It's still the native-ish language of
> OS/2. Where's OS/2 today? Left behind. REXX has no Unicode support (it
> does, however, support DBCS - useful, no?), no inbuilt networking
> support (there are third-party TCP/IP socket libraries for OS/2 REXX,
> but I don't know that other REXX implementations have socket services;
> and that's just basic BSD sockets, no higher-level protocol handling
> at all), etc, etc. Sure, it's not technically dead... but is anyone
> developing the language further? I don't think so. Is new REXX code
> being written? Not a lot. Yet when OS/2 was more popular, REXX
> definitely had its installed base. It was the one obvious scripting
> language for any OS/2 program. Languages can definitely die, or at
> least be so left behind that they may as well be dead.
> 
> ChrisA
> 

Rexx is still well used on mainframes.
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk     tundra@tundraware.com
PGP Key:         http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/