Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.176 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.75; '*S*': 0.10; 'subject:Django': 0.03; 'subject:when': 0.07; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'django': 0.29; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'there': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'subject:with': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.40; 'special': 0.67; 'received:209.85.218.46': 0.91; 'received:mail-yi0-f46.google.com': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lHNofr8GsiAFblnfHfGSuamcmuOb8rC8iM1bwsmBLoY=; b=jC1Zj15jQ3NfmCxo+rgOmfwdNhoy4lGOmn1wQt9fdBamHEWcf/SYay+n2y3o3CrxYM /a1LHCO2tq65ltHcZH0iKdqYT2HDE3XbEBl6tFIHC5+YwSL+VUvzGQz+frajQsDcU0/U FB5Ef6wU05nYKIPV+Flhbp9R+pSTihqPL63wo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 03:28:14 +0800 Subject: what is the advantage of Django when comparing with LAMP and J2EE platform? From: smith jack To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 2 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1312313303 news.xs4all.nl 23970 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:32985 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:10761 There are so many choice to do the same thing, so is there any special advantage Django brings to user?