Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.014 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'static': 0.04; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'language.': 0.14; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'worlds,': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'typing': 0.19; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'paul': 0.24; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'on,': 0.29; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'writes:': 0.31; 'languages': 0.32; 'cases': 0.33; 'winning': 0.38; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'major': 0.40; 'new': 0.61; 'offer': 0.62; 'our': 0.64; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'subject:! ': 0.74; 'guaranteed': 0.75; '1990s,': 0.84; 'flame': 0.84; 'wars': 0.84; 'absolutely': 0.87; 'forever.': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: Python is DOOMED! Again! Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 19:56:47 +0000 References: <54c07d04$0$13012$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <54c0a571$0$13002$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <54c1063c$0$13008$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87egqm7h3e.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-92-24-222-48.ppp.as43234.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: <87egqm7h3e.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 19 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1421956621 news.xs4all.nl 2855 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60661 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:84263 On 22/01/2015 19:25, Paul Rubin wrote: > Steven D'Aprano writes: >> Since the "language wars" of the 1990s, dynamic languages have won. > > Are you kidding? Nothing has won, the wars are still going on, and > dynamic and static typing both have their winning use cases and will be > around forever. > Unless you offer a new language that is absolutely guaranteed to have the best of both worlds, in which case there'd be major flame wars over whether you'd call it dynatically or stamically typed. -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence