Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Erik Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Continuing indentation Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 02:24:58 +0000 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <8760x4bo5h.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <871t7sbkex.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87vb53se36.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <56d8d33d$0$1585$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <56D8DF99.6070808@lucidity.plus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1kJFeAdTsINabJR1DwJC6g2OrjcakKRJGhHcORcsCq+w== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'operator': 0.03; 'binary': 0.05; 'operator,': 0.09; 'splitting': 0.09; 'from:addr:python': 0.16; 'pep8': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'why,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'preferred': 0.20; 'to:name:python- list@python.org': 0.20; 'to:2**1': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'example': 0.26; 'tend': 0.27; 'too': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'mean': 0.38; 'end': 0.39; 'why': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Rr04V3SK c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=X2VfThTz+8HMaRSzjuZh7Q==:117 a=X2VfThTz+8HMaRSzjuZh7Q==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=z52rVZVsEMoAmSnI7aMA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=Ia59hBSF62EA:10 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:104011 On 04/03/16 01:23, INADA Naoki wrote: >> Indeed. I don't understand why, when splitting a condition such as this, >> people tend to put the operator at the end of each line. >> >> > Because PEP8 says: > >> The preferred place to break around a binary operator is after the > operator, not before it. I mean in the general scheme of things, which is why I gave a C example too ;) Perhaps I am challenging the wisdom of of PEP8 ;) E.