Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; ';-)': 0.03; 'url:pypi': 0.03; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'modify': 0.07; 'python3': 0.07; 'string': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'line:': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:string': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'bug': 0.12; 'language.': 0.14; '###': 0.16; '23:07,': 0.16; '4.4,': 0.16; 'comma': 0.16; 'computes': 0.16; 'expressions,': 0.16; 'grasp': 0.16; 'instead:': 0.16; 'iterates': 0.16; 'presented,': 0.16; 'pythonic': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'tracker,': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'module': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'print': 0.22; 'this?': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'integer': 0.24; 'string,': 0.24; 'script': 0.25; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'fixed': 0.29; 'characters': 0.30; 'dec': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; "skip:' 10": 0.31; 'bug?': 0.31; 'decimal': 0.31; 'everywhere': 0.31; 'loads': 0.31; 'subject:numbers': 0.31; 'regular': 0.32; 'linux': 0.33; 'url:python': 0.33; 'bugs': 0.33; 'subject:from': 0.34; 'subject:with': 0.35; "can't": 0.35; 'except': 0.35; 'convert': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'url:org': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'expected': 0.38; 'handle': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'skip:- 60': 0.39; 'skip:p 20': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'tell': 0.60; 'numbers': 0.61; 'our': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'total': 0.65; 'thomas': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; '2014,': 0.84; 'sum.': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: extracting numbers with decimal places from a string Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:04:49 +0000 References: <7240a574-dfd7-46c3-80eb-0657b41894bb@googlegroups.com> <3233082.KAWmNIKqbW@PointedEars.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-92-24-222-48.ppp.as43234.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 In-Reply-To: <3233082.KAWmNIKqbW@PointedEars.de> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 82 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1421021101 news.xs4all.nl 2898 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37437 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:83579 On 11/01/2015 23:07, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > Store Makhzan wrote: > >> I have this script which can calculate the total of numbers given in a >> string […] >> total = 0 >> for c in '0123456789': >> total += int(c) >> print total >> >> […] >> How should I modify this script to find the total of if the numbers given >> in the string form have decimal places? That is, how do I need to modify >> this line: […] >> >> for c in '1.32, 5.32, 4.4, 3.78': >> >> […] to find the total of these given numbers. > > The original script already does not do what it advertises. Instead, it > iterates over the characters of the string, attempts to convert each to an > integer and then computes the sum. That is _not_ “calculate the total of > numbers given in a string”. > > A solution has been presented, but it is not very pythonic because the > original code was not; that should have been > > ### Ahh, Gauß ;-) > print(sum(map(lambda x: int(x), list('0123456789')))) > ### -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Also, it cannot handle non-numeric strings well. Consider this instead: > > ### -------------------------------------------------------------------- > from re import findall > > s = '1.32, 5.32, 4.4, 3.78' > print(sum(map(lambda x: float(x), findall(r'-?\d+\.\d+', s)))) > ### -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > But if you are sure that except for the comma separator there are only > numeric strings, it is more efficient to use re.split() instead of > re.findall() here. > > > Aside: > > I thought I had more than a fair grasp of regular expressions, but I am > puzzled by > > | $ python3 > | Python 3.4.2 (default, Dec 27 2014, 13:16:08) > | [GCC 4.9.2] on linux > | >>> from re import findall > | >>> s = '1.32, 5.32, 4.4, 3.78' > | >>> findall(r'-?\d+(\.\d+)?', s) > | ['.32', '.32', '.4', '.78'] > > Why does this more flexible pattern not work as I expected in Python 3.x, > but virtually everywhere else? > > And why this? > > | >>> findall(r'-?\d+\.\d+', s) > | ['1.32', '5.32', '4.4', '3.78'] > | >>> findall(r'-?\d+(\.\d+)', s) > | ['.32', '.32', '.4', '.78'] > > Feature? Bug? > I can't tell you as I avoid regexes like I avoid the plague. Having said that I do know that there loads of old bugs on the bug tracker, many of which are fixed in the "new" regex module that's available here https://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex/ -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence