Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.011 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'programmer': 0.03; '16,': 0.03; 'think,': 0.07; 'appropriate.': 0.09; 'url:blog': 0.10; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'which,': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'example': 0.22; 'programming': 0.22; '(in': 0.22; 'saying': 0.22; 'example.': 0.24; 'url:02': 0.24; 'helpful': 0.24; 'right.': 0.26; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'tried': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'said,': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'gives': 0.31; 'too.': 0.31; 'fri,': 0.33; 'guess': 0.33; 'comment': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'url:org': 0.36; 'detail': 0.37; 'level': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; "couldn't": 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'most': 0.60; 'real': 0.63; 'irrelevant': 0.84; 'url:2013': 0.84; 'rusi': 0.91; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=z5FjL2TdilcLPjgMBSg1iUaJ2u5d9dxz1HmYiKLB4A0=; b=foHDdvizX1fzKuuLDEBy2e6XkAGLx6V0Yk7k2udbPSYxAIQ0GTrUrWmgRJDRnreuq4 d+0p4bduXumBzY/wy31McGlHEQicwNj2kg4oPheBTkuePGGZMp5VSrsmVXTzBCitgfXu QV9xS/22Cu6IbV2u6XjKr9iDBtY19AFuwO1Ie1/iNyLvNKfFgxawRLZBeXkOhgdYBYCA /8hiNA8uMInREoNArlBcDVsCwX5xcDfjDtcHfTKUmwJ3Djd22oUPG/4ZNW7uKvwhYfA1 dhpkXtz+DhLpn7XKSL9f608eoqkCBetb3hcEEIfpLsPELh27YGVBalWYN4aNQeFkvNfa qRaA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.64.208 with SMTP id f16mr28404502vci.32.1368717578704; Thu, 16 May 2013 08:19:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2a8e503f-50c0-4d13-8ea3-c310575c977e@wg15g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> References: <5190b049$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <2a8e503f-50c0-4d13-8ea3-c310575c977e@wg15g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 01:19:38 +1000 Subject: Re: Software epigrams From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 21 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1368717581 news.xs4all.nl 15884 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38337 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:45433 On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:06 AM, rusi wrote: > On May 16, 7:37 pm, Chris Angelico wrote: >> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Neil Cerutti wrote: >> > When I tried to pin down what an irrelevant detail in a computer >> > program could be, I couldn't do it. I guess comment decorations, >> > maybe? But those would have no bearing on the level of problem >> > for which a programming language is most appropriate. >> >> Let me give you a real example. >> [snip] > > You are just saying (in specific detail) what I said, viz that the > programmer is one who 'relevates' ie sifts the relevant from the > irrelevant and a good programming language is one that gives good > relevating tools: > http://blog.languager.org/2013/02/c-in-education-and-software-engineering.html Right. All I'm adding is a concrete example - which, I think, will be helpful to Neil, and perhaps to others too. ChrisA